Tubomanometry correlations with patient characteristics and other diagnostic tests of Eustachian tube dysfunction: a cohort study of 432 ears

Abstract

Objectives Currently, there is no consensus regarding the best protocol for diagnosing Eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD). We aimed to evaluate how patient characteristics affect tubomanometry (TMM) results. If an association between patient characteristics and TMM results exists, this should be considered in TMM interpretation. We also wanted to study if TMM correlates with other diagnostic tools of ETD. Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted on all patients with TMM results available from November 2011 to October 2020 at a tertiary referral center, including 432 ears from 219 patients. An association between diagnostic tests and patient characteristics was assessed using regression models. Spearman’s rank correlation was used to analyze correlations between diagnostic tests. Results None of the studied patient characteristics (age, gender, body mass index, smoking, sinonasal disease) was associated with TMM results except for pollen allergy (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.15–2.63, P = 0.009). TMM results correlated with Valsalva maneuver performance (P < 0.001, ρ = 0.31) and otomicroscopic signs of inadequate middle ear ventilation (P < 0.001, ρ = 0.28). The Eustachian tube dysfunction questionnaire-7 (ETDQ-7) score did not correlate with any diagnostic method. Conclusions TMM results are unaffected by patient characteristics other than pollen allergy. Thus, TMM may be used in ETD diagnostics in a wide variety of patients with straightforward interpretation. TMM correlates with other diagnostic tests studied but not with ETDQ-7. ETDQ-7 does not seem to correlate with other diagnostic tests and appears nonspecific in ETD diagnostics.

Balloon Eustachian tuboplasty for obstructive Eustachian tube dysfunction: retrospective multicentre cohort study of 248 patients

“…The percentage of ears improving tympanogram in all groups from baseline to 3 months is 63.73% (95% CI 55. 23…”

Concordance Analysis of the Pressure Chamber and Tubomanometer According to Estève for the Determination of Eustachian Tube Opening Pressure

“…Procedure and performance therefore require time to explain to the patient and experience in clinical interpretation (37). However, alternatives such as the subjective ETDQ-7 do not provide good results for selecting patients with ETD because, among other things, it does not correlate with findings on micro-otoscopy with or without Valsalva maneuver or TMM (38). Also, in our collective, all four subjects with suspected baro-challenge induced ETD had a normal ETDQ-7 score.…”

Balloon Eustachian Tuboplasty—A Feasible Double‐Blinded Sham Surgery Randomized Clinical Trial Protocol to Study Efficacy

“…Tubomanometry (TMM) 27,28 was performed with 30, 40, and 50 mbar pressures on both ears (Eustachian Tube Diagnostic Tubomanometer, La Diffusion Technique Francaise, Saint Etienne, France). To equalize middle ear pressure between measurements, the patients closed their nostrils and swallowed twice after which they were asked to yawn.…”