2010
DOI: 10.1016/s1473-3099(10)70138-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tuberculous meningitis: a uniform case definition for use in clinical research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

14
742
4
41

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 721 publications
(801 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
14
742
4
41
Order By: Relevance
“…Consensus uniform case definitions were used to categorise patients as definite, probable, possible or not TBM 11 . In addition to the consensus case definitions, clinical TBM was defined as subjects without a positive microbiologic result, but who were treated empirically for TBM treatment due to high clinical suspicion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Consensus uniform case definitions were used to categorise patients as definite, probable, possible or not TBM 11 . In addition to the consensus case definitions, clinical TBM was defined as subjects without a positive microbiologic result, but who were treated empirically for TBM treatment due to high clinical suspicion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensitivity of Xpert MTB/Rif was evaluated against a composite reference standard (any positive CSF test - AFB smear, Xpert or culture i.e. definite TBM according to the uniform case definition) 11 . A separate analysis was conducted against the uniform case definition of probable or definite TBM 11 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, we used the uniform clinical case definition as described by Marais and colleagues. 10 We categorised participants as definite, probable, possible, and not tuberculous meningitis. We defined definite tuberculous meningitis in accordance with the consensus definition as any CSF test positivity by microscopy, culture, or commercialised PCR (including Xpert or Xpert Ultra).…”
Section: Implications Of All the Available Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Sensitivity compared with consensus clinical case definition was only 36%. 9,10 The second large cohort study, in Vietnam, measured Xpert against the same clinical case definition and found 59% sensitivity generally using 2 mL or less of centrifuged CSF. 11,12 A third Ugandan study reported 28% sensitivity with 2 mL of uncentrifuged CSF and 72% sensitivity when centrifuging a median volume of 6 mL (IQR 4-10) with Xpert.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%