2020
DOI: 10.1111/ele.13532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trophic control changes with season and nutrient loading in lakes

Abstract: Experiments have revealed much about top‐down and bottom‐up control in ecosystems, but manipulative experiments are limited in spatial and temporal scale. To obtain a more nuanced understanding of trophic control over large scales, we explored long‐term time‐series data from 13 globally distributed lakes and used empirical dynamic modelling to quantify interaction strengths between zooplankton and phytoplankton over time within and across lakes. Across all lakes, top‐down effects were associated with nutrients… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
43
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
3
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To assess whether change in body size more strongly influenced changes in density, or vice versa, we used Convergent Cross Mapping (or CCM, (Sugihara et al 2012;Rogers et al 2020)) on the density and body size time series. CCM quantifies the degree to which one time series causally influences another one by estimating how much information of the one is contained in the other (Sugihara et al 2012): if a variable X causally influences another variable Y, but Y does not influence X, we should expect Y to contain information about X, but not the other way around.…”
Section: Time-series Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess whether change in body size more strongly influenced changes in density, or vice versa, we used Convergent Cross Mapping (or CCM, (Sugihara et al 2012;Rogers et al 2020)) on the density and body size time series. CCM quantifies the degree to which one time series causally influences another one by estimating how much information of the one is contained in the other (Sugihara et al 2012): if a variable X causally influences another variable Y, but Y does not influence X, we should expect Y to contain information about X, but not the other way around.…”
Section: Time-series Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See Movie S1 of (Ye et al., 2015) for an explanation. EDM is increasingly used in ecology to forecast population size (Perretti et al., 2013), identify causal connections (Sugihara et al., 2012), quantify species interactions (Deyle et al., 2016; Rogers et al., 2020) and identify chaotic dynamics (Sugihara, 1994; Sugihara & May, 1990). However, EDM requires long time series and frequent sampling to fully resolve the attractor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lake food webs are increasingly experiencing a large variety of environmental changes that can take the form of either pulse or press perturbations, such as short-and long-term temperature changes (IPCC 2013, Seneviratne et al 2014, storms (Stockwell et al 2020), salinization (Kaushal et al 2018), or altered biogeochemical cycles (Kritzberg et al 2019). Response patterns of multiple trophic levels to other disturbances are likely to be different because of the different nature or intensity of the disturbance, but we may also expect similar temporal and spatial response dependencies for other bottom-up and top-down perturbations (e.g., see Rogers et al 2020). Because many direct and indirect, abiotic (e.g., trophic status, temperature, dissolved organic carbon or light climate) and biotic factors (e.g., initial standing stock, biodiversity, or community trait composition) can potentially constrain local responses, further studies could focus on deciphering mechanisms driving site-to-site response differences by employing integrative statistical modeling (e.g., structural equation modeling; Grace et al 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Response patterns of multiple trophic levels to other disturbances are likely to be different because of the different nature or intensity of the disturbance, but we may also expect similar temporal and spatial response dependencies for other bottom-up and top-down perturbations (e.g., see Rogers et al 2020). Since many direct and indirect, abiotic (e.g., trophic status, temperature, dissolved organic carbon or light climate) and biotic factors (e.g., initial standing stock, biodiversity or…”
Section: Accepted Articlementioning
confidence: 99%