2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(00)01693-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trinucleotide (CAG) repeat polymorphisms in the androgen receptor gene: molecular markers of risk for male infertility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
107
2
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
7
107
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Data from some studies have established that AR missense substitutions contribute about 2 % and CAG repeat expansion (>28 repeats) may contribute up to 35 % of male infertility cases [82]. A preliminary research indicated that the mean AR gene CAG repeat length was significantly larger in azoospermic subjects than in control fertile men [84]. Mutations in TAD range from point mutations, insertions or deletions, or altered CAG repeats of AR gene.…”
Section: The Androgen Receptor (Ar) Gene Mutationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data from some studies have established that AR missense substitutions contribute about 2 % and CAG repeat expansion (>28 repeats) may contribute up to 35 % of male infertility cases [82]. A preliminary research indicated that the mean AR gene CAG repeat length was significantly larger in azoospermic subjects than in control fertile men [84]. Mutations in TAD range from point mutations, insertions or deletions, or altered CAG repeats of AR gene.…”
Section: The Androgen Receptor (Ar) Gene Mutationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on this information, in a study of exon 1 of the AR gene in infertile males of predominantly (60%) Chinese ethnic origin it was found that expansion of the trinucleotide (CAG) repeat and thus of the polyglutamine tract could be associated with increased risk of impaired spermatogenesis (Tut et al 1997). This finding was then corroborated by several studies from a variety of different ethnic populations including Japanese, Caucasian, North American, French, Israeli, Taiwanese and Spanish (Yoshida et al 1999;Dowsing et al 1999;Mifsud et al 2001;Wallerand et al 2001;Patrizio et al 2001;Madgar et al 2002;Pan et al 2002;Casella et al 2003;Asatiani et al 2003;Mengual et al 2003). However, several others, who have investigated Swedish, Belgian, German, Japanese, Danish, Dutch, Indian, Greek, New Zealander, Finish, Hong Kong Chinese and Italian populations were unable to demonstrate an association (Giwercman et al 1998;Legius et al 1999;Hiort et al 1999;Dadze et al 2000;Sasagawa et al 2000Sasagawa et al , 2001Von Eckardstein et al 2001;Yu and Handelsman 2001;Kukuvitis et al 2002;Rajpert-De Meyts et al 2002;Van Golde et al 2002;Thangaraj et al 2002;Dhillon and Husain 2003;Erasmuson et al 2003;Lund et al 2003;Tse et al 2003;Ferlin et al 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Also within the subgroups of infertile males presenting with varying degrees of impaired sperm production (azoospermia, severe oligozoospermia, oligozoospermia and poor motility/morphology only group) we found no statistically significant association between the size of their respective CAG repeats or polyglutamine tracts and the severity of impaired sperm production (Table 2). Tut et al (1997) suggested that an enlargement of the CAG tract repeats ( 28) in infertile males is associated with a 4-fold increased risk of infertility, whereas Mifsud et al (2001) reported the odds ratio for azoospermia as 7-fold higher for patients with 26 CAG repeats than in those with < 26 CAG repeats. These studies suggested that the more severe the spermatogenic defect the higher the CAG repeat number should be.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations