Tribological characteristics of one-process and two-process cylinder liner honed surfaces under reciprocating sliding conditions

Graboń, Wiesław; Pawlus, Paweł; Sęp, Jarosław

doi:10.1016/j.triboint.2010.02.003

Cited by 87 publications

(37 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Jang and Peng [18] found that the contact of anisotropic surfaces of negative skewness was more elastic than that of surfaces of Gaussian ordinate distribution and the same standard deviation of surface height. A similar tendency was confirmed for isotropic surfaces, considering the asperities' interaction [19].The obtained findings were confirmed experimentally only for the effect of surface height on the rough surface contact; when the roughness height was higher, the deformations were bigger [20,21].The functional properties of two-process surfaces can be better than those of one-process textures [22][23][24][25]. Two-process surfaces can be machined or formed during wear.…”

supporting

confidence: 62%

“…Typically, performances of one-and two-process surfaces are compared for the same standard deviation of surface height Sq [22][23][24]. Two-process surfaces II5050011 and II250250011 are characterized by the Sq parameter of about 0.3 µm; however, surfaces II5050055 and II25025005 are characterized by the Sq parameter of about 1.5 µm.…”

Section: Contact Of Two-process Surfacesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The functional properties of two-process surfaces can be better than those of one-process textures [22][23][24][25]. Two-process surfaces can be machined or formed during wear.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The Effect of Isotropic One-Process and Two-Process Surface Textures on the Contact of Flat Surfaces

2019

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The contact of random modeled one-and two-process textures with smooth, flat surfaces is discussed in this paper. An elastic-plastic contact model was applied, assuming a distributed radius of summits. A one-process surface was characterized by the standard deviations of height and the correlation length; however, it also had a two-process texture by the standard deviations of the plateau and valley structures, the material ratio at the transition point, and the correlation lengths of the plateau and valley parts. It was found that the contact characteristics depended on the height and spatial properties of the surface texture. The plateau part governs the contact characteristics of two-process surfaces, while the effect of the valley surface portion is smaller. The plastic deformation leads to a smaller effect of the surface texture on the contact characteristics. elastic deformation, but an increase in the correlation length led to a decrease in the maximum contact pressure. It was found [15] that an increase in the plasticity index due to the change in the surface topography of Gaussian ordinate distribution led to increases in the contact area and the contact load for the same separation. The authors of paper [16] analyzed the effect of the correlation length on the real area of contact. It was found that a higher correlation length corresponded to a higher number of contact points and therefore a larger contact area for the same separation based on surface heights.Typically, the contact of surfaces of Gaussian ordinate distribution was analyzed. In Reference [17], the contact of surfaces of different ordinate distribution (the skewness Ssk was in the range from −2 to +2) was studied. It was found that skewness affected the contact load and the contact area. A separation based on asperity heights for the same load or the same contact area is lower for more negative skewness for the same standard deviation of surface height. For surfaces of asymmetric ordinate distribution, similar to Gaussian topographies, the contact load is proportional to the contact area, except for very large loads. Jang and Peng [18] found that the contact of anisotropic surfaces of negative skewness was more elastic than that of surfaces of Gaussian ordinate distribution and the same standard deviation of surface height. A similar tendency was confirmed for isotropic surfaces, considering the asperities' interaction [19].The obtained findings were confirmed experimentally only for the effect of surface height on the rough surface contact; when the roughness height was higher, the deformations were bigger [20,21].The functional properties of two-process surfaces can be better than those of one-process textures [22][23][24][25]. Two-process surfaces can be machined or formed during wear. Only a few publications about the contact of two-process surfaces have been presented so far [26][27][28]. Greenwood and Williamson [1] thought that two-process worn surfaces were characterized by the Gaussian distribution of heights of summits from the ...

show abstract

supporting

confidence: 62%

Section: Contact Of Two-process Surfacesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Effect of Isotropic One-Process and Two-Process Surface Textures on the Contact of Flat Surfaces

2019

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It is found that a combination of surface roughness parameters is necessary to characterize the functional property of a surface [11][12]. Wear is reported [13] to be larger when the initial values of the amplitude parameters S a (Arithmetic mean deviation of the surface, μm), S q (Root-Mean-Square deviation of the Surface, μm) and S Htp (Surface section height difference (20% -80%)), as well as rms. slope S Dq are high.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Multicriteria Optimization for Determining Low Wear of the Surface Produced in Electrical Discharge Machining

Sivaprasad¹

2017

IJRET

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Proper separation of this profile portion is functionally important; the plateau surface part decides about either lubrication or contact of two-process textures [6,18,19,21].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Distinguishing the Plateau and Valley Components of Profiles From Various Types of Two-Process Textures

Graboń

Pawlus

2016

Metrology and Measurement Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper presents methods of separating the plateau part for various types of two-process profiles, having the traces of two processes. The traditional method based on the plateau-valley threshold, according to the ISO 13565-3 standard, is not always sufficient, since the valley portion can include plateau roughness. Starting and finishing points of each plateau in the measured profiles should be determined. The procedure found in the technical literature depends on setting not only the plateau-valley threshold but also a lower threshold. This approach was a little modified for profiles that contain both random and deterministic topography components. A new procedure of determination of the lower threshold was proposed for stratified profiles containing two deterministic parts. The valleys can be characterized by their widths and the distance between them. In addition, a description of the material probability curve is proposed.

show abstract

Tribological characteristics of one-process and two-process cylinder liner honed surfaces under reciprocating sliding conditions

Cited by 87 publications

References 19 publications

The Effect of Isotropic One-Process and Two-Process Surface Textures on the Contact of Flat Surfaces

The Effect of Isotropic One-Process and Two-Process Surface Textures on the Contact of Flat Surfaces

Multicriteria Optimization for Determining Low Wear of the Surface Produced in Electrical Discharge Machining

Distinguishing the Plateau and Valley Components of Profiles From Various Types of Two-Process Textures

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About