1958
DOI: 10.1080/11035895809447242
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Triassic Dicynodont reptiles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Full-size DOI: 10.7717/peerj.10408/ fig-11 A semi-aquatic lifestyle for Lystrosaurus was first proposed by Broom (1902) and Broom (1903) and later supported by several studies (Watson, 1912;Watson, 1913;Brink, 1951;Camp, 1956;Cluver, 1971;Hotton, 1986;Kemp, 1982;Kitching, 1968) based on various cranial and postcranial morphological features. These studies were later refuted by King (1991) and King & Cluver (1991) who proposed that the morphological characteristics used to infer an aquatic lifestyle could equally represent a fossorial or burrowing ecology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Full-size DOI: 10.7717/peerj.10408/ fig-11 A semi-aquatic lifestyle for Lystrosaurus was first proposed by Broom (1902) and Broom (1903) and later supported by several studies (Watson, 1912;Watson, 1913;Brink, 1951;Camp, 1956;Cluver, 1971;Hotton, 1986;Kemp, 1982;Kitching, 1968) based on various cranial and postcranial morphological features. These studies were later refuted by King (1991) and King & Cluver (1991) who proposed that the morphological characteristics used to infer an aquatic lifestyle could equally represent a fossorial or burrowing ecology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…2 ) . That pattern of sex dimorphism is matched in dicynodont reptiles (Toerien 1953;Camp & Welles 1956) and is rivalled in a variety of living mammals (pigs, peccaries, chevrotains, muskdeer and Chinese water-deer) where males have large tusks and females have smaller tusks or lack them entirely. The size and orientation of heterodontosaurid tusks would have precluded their use in feeding, and they were most probably employed as weapons, rather like the tusks of peccaries and chevrotains.…”
Section: A Circannual Life Cyclementioning
confidence: 97%
“…The only therapsid species that have been demonstrated to have been sexually dimorphic are amongst the Dicynodontia (e.g. Placerias [ 39 ], Pelanomodon [ 22 ], Aulacephalodon [ 33 ], Diictodon [ 34 ], Cistecephalus [ 36 ], Lystrosaurus [ 35 ] and maybe Digalodon [ 37 ]). Dicynodont are know to have had a cornified beak and many species have rugose nasal and/or supraorbital bosses and ridges that are consistent with the presence of a keratinized covering or projecting nasal horns [ 69 ] that are likely to have been sexually dimorphic and involved in intraspecific combat [ 20 – 22 , 39 , 78 , 34 , 36 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geist [ 38 ] hypothesized much the same behaviour for some dicynodonts. Though less widely acknowledged, this hypothesis has been proposed for some sexually dimorphic dicynodonts, such as Diictodon , Pelanomodon or Placerias [ 22 , 34 , 39 ]. Also, the enlarged canines of the basal anomodont Tiarajudens eccentricus have been interpreted as a possibly sexually dimorphic structure for intraspecific combat or intimidation [ 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%