2016
DOI: 10.21276/iabcr.2016.2.2.15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trends in Molecular Classification of Breast Carcinoma in a tertiary Health care centre: A 5 year retrospective study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…20,21 These Basal-like breast cancers are mitotically active, highgrade and are associated with younger age of the patient. 7,8 A readily available prognostic immunohistochemical surrogate marker, easily applied on formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded tissues, would therefore identify these molecular subtypes of breast cancer patients. 14 Study by Sofi GN et al, in their study of 101 cases, observed ER/PR positivity in 63 % cases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…20,21 These Basal-like breast cancers are mitotically active, highgrade and are associated with younger age of the patient. 7,8 A readily available prognostic immunohistochemical surrogate marker, easily applied on formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded tissues, would therefore identify these molecular subtypes of breast cancer patients. 14 Study by Sofi GN et al, in their study of 101 cases, observed ER/PR positivity in 63 % cases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In has been shown that patients of breast carcinoma overexpressing Her2 (Her2 positive cohort) do respond to targeted therapy such as herceptin. [5][6][7][8] Consistent with most widely accepted clinical practice, authors considered a tumour Her2: 2+as being scored as Her2: 3 +on IHC. FISH (Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization) was not done in.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Immunohistochemistry (IHC) or in situ hybridization (ISH) assays are well-established methods used to distinguish subtypes in breast cancer (BC) based on hormone receptor statuses [1]. Increasingly, RNA-based signature assays such as MammaPrint, Oncotype DX, and Predictor Analysis of Microarray 50 (PAM50) [2] are being employed as supplementary prognostic indicators due to studies demonstrating more significant differential survival between identified subtypes when compared to standard clinicopathological factors [3][4][5]. In particular, PAM50 intrinsic molecular subtyping, as part of the NanoString Prosigna [6] and the Agendia BluePrint panel [7], is becoming more widely used in early-stage breast cancers to determine the likelihood of responding to chemotherapy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The author also claims the result to be attributed to predominantly younger patient population in their study group. 18…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%