2014
DOI: 10.1080/09362835.2013.865532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trends in Autism Research: A Systematic Journal Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the one hand, these findings reflect the current global trend in autism research supporting data reported by several authors and research groups (Graff et al 2014;Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee (IACC) 2014;Milner and Cho 2014). For instance, the IACC (2014) described that 55% of the total number of 2010 ASD primary research publications were dedicated to biomedical research, 19%-to treatments and interventions, and only 10%-to services and life-span issues.…”
Section: Scope Of Reporting Cultural Factorssupporting
confidence: 51%
“…On the one hand, these findings reflect the current global trend in autism research supporting data reported by several authors and research groups (Graff et al 2014;Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee (IACC) 2014;Milner and Cho 2014). For instance, the IACC (2014) described that 55% of the total number of 2010 ASD primary research publications were dedicated to biomedical research, 19%-to treatments and interventions, and only 10%-to services and life-span issues.…”
Section: Scope Of Reporting Cultural Factorssupporting
confidence: 51%
“…These articles helped inform the field of EBDs on areas for future research and documented what was known from prior research. In addition, researchers interested in students with LDs (McFarland et al, 2013) and students with ASD (Graff et al, 2014) have conducted journal analyses to inform the field. Clearly, there is value to systematically analyzing and synthesizing research from focused journals to apprise researchers of the state of the field and to make recommendations for future research.…”
Section: Reviewing Past Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous systematic reviews of special education research journals have been conducted to determine the amount and topics (e.g., specific academic areas, behavior) of research that is published (e.g., Clarke, Dunlap, & Stichter, 2002; Gage, Lewis, & Adamson, 2010; Graff, Berkeley, Evmenova, & Park, 2014; McFarland, Williams, & Miciak, 2013). For example, two comprehensive journal reviews give a broad picture of trends in the amount of intervention research with students with mild disabilities (Lessen, Dudzinski, Karsh, & Van Acker, 1989; Mastropieri et al, 2009).…”
Section: The Current Investigationmentioning
confidence: 99%