2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.10.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trends and Geographic Variation in Acute Respiratory Failure and ARDS Mortality in the United States

Abstract: Background Despite numerous advances in the understanding of the pathophysiology, progression, and management of acute respiratory failure (ARF) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), there is limited contemporary data on the mortality burden of ARF and ARDS in the United States (US). Research Question What are the contemporary trends and geographic variation in ARF and ARDS-related mortality in the US? Study Design and Methods A ret… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More than 50% of critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) will suffer from acute respiratory failure (ARF) due to respiratory diseases or pulmonary vascular diseases, accompanied by pulmonary ventilation and/or ventilation dysfunction [1][2][3]. ARF can cause metabolic disorders and accelerate the deterioration of the underlying condition, which is related to a mortality rate of 35%-46% [4]. Therefore, effective assessment of the prognosis of patients with ARF is of great significance for clinically formulating treatment strategies and improving the survival rate of patients [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More than 50% of critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) will suffer from acute respiratory failure (ARF) due to respiratory diseases or pulmonary vascular diseases, accompanied by pulmonary ventilation and/or ventilation dysfunction [1][2][3]. ARF can cause metabolic disorders and accelerate the deterioration of the underlying condition, which is related to a mortality rate of 35%-46% [4]. Therefore, effective assessment of the prognosis of patients with ARF is of great significance for clinically formulating treatment strategies and improving the survival rate of patients [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11][12][13] While the reassuring findings are encouraging, continued comprehensive COVID-19 infection control protocol implementation and COVID-19 screening of patients and health care personnel and proactive management of coronary artery disease patients is needed. [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] Our data do not provide information regarding the COVID-19 infection rates among health care workers taking care of patients who underwent CABG. Given that very few patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 in the postoperative period highlights the effectiveness of preoperative screening and strict infection control measures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary study outcome was mortality occurring within 30 days of CABG. The secondary outcomes assessed included stroke (ICD-10: I60-I69), acute kidney injury (ICD-10: N17), acute respiratory distress syndrome (ICD-10 Code: J80), 14 and mechanical ventilation (ICD-10 codes: 5A1945Z, 5A1955Z, 39.65; Current Procedural Terminology codes: 1022227, 31500, 0BH17EZ, 0BH18EZ) occurring within 30 days of CABG. Table E2 enlists the diagnosis codes for the various measures and outcomes.…”
Section: Measures and Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, the intervention group and the control group differed significantly in age, which could have a potential effect on the overall outcome in this patient group. The average age was older in the intervention group, and therefore, one would expect this factor to have a potential negative effect if any effect at all, based on the literature (21, 22). However, in our sample, no significant association of age with the primary outcome was observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%