2020
DOI: 10.25136/2409-8728.2020.5.32865
View full text |Buy / Rent full text
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: This article discusses the causes of current interest in conspiratorial explanations, called by the author a conspiracy discourse. In the latter, he defines interpretation of the problem as plot of a particular malign subject, debunker of such plot, and audience of the debunker. The three main causes of interests in conspiratorial explanations are highlighted: simple cause-and-effect explanations of complex phenomena, propensity to the values of mistrust and conflict, opportunity to use conspiracy discourses f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mythologeme of the common secret enemy is organically included in the epidemiological narrative and is explicated quite regularly, including through hostile rhetoric. The conspiratorial picture of the world, quite stable in its mythological core and, at the same time, constantly updated by the latest ideological trends and news events [10][11][12], is a potentially dangerous ground in terms of conflict-prone development of related social contacts, including contacts of individuals with representatives of law enforcement bodies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mythologeme of the common secret enemy is organically included in the epidemiological narrative and is explicated quite regularly, including through hostile rhetoric. The conspiratorial picture of the world, quite stable in its mythological core and, at the same time, constantly updated by the latest ideological trends and news events [10][11][12], is a potentially dangerous ground in terms of conflict-prone development of related social contacts, including contacts of individuals with representatives of law enforcement bodies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%