2012
DOI: 10.1109/jstars.2012.2196978
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tree Species Identification in Mixed Baltic Forest Using LiDAR and Multispectral Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By comparison, active remote sensing instruments, such as Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) scanners, have played a relatively small role in efforts to detect and map tree species [11,12]. Studies using LiDAR in conjunction with spectral data [13][14][15][16] have yielded promising results, indicating the potential of combining remote sensing technologies for species mapping.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By comparison, active remote sensing instruments, such as Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) scanners, have played a relatively small role in efforts to detect and map tree species [11,12]. Studies using LiDAR in conjunction with spectral data [13][14][15][16] have yielded promising results, indicating the potential of combining remote sensing technologies for species mapping.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since HI records surface spectral reflectance characteristics of objects, while FWL reveals scattering properties and geometrical structure (roughness, slope, spatial distribution) of targets, their complementary nature suggests that the fusion of HI and FWL can be beneficial for applications such as land cover classification, forest inventory estimation, and obscured target detection Kanaev et al, 2011). Although previous work has addressed the issue of fusing LiDAR data and HI, for example (Dalponte et al, 2008;Erdody and Moskal, 2010;Jones et al, 2008;Dinuls et al, 2012), the work has predominantly been limited to using simple gridded discrete return LiDAR data, such as Digital Elevation Models (DEM), Digital Terrain Models (DTM), or using data from a FWL system that has been converted to discrete return point clouds (Anderson et al, 2008;Asner et al, 2007;Ranjani et al, 2014;Paris and Bruzzone, 2015 feature level fusion with HI (Sarrazin et al, 2011;Jung, 2011). However in these instances, the FWL return energy profile in the entire observed cone of diffraction of the outgoing laser pulses is discarded before the analysis of the fused FWL and HI dataset is undertaken.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In ideal conditions, several tree species can be identified by hyperspectral imagery with a precision up to 97-98 % (Dinuls et al, 2011;Dinuls et al, 2012). However, in practice there are several factors affecting the reflection from tree canopies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spectral behaviour of plants, in particular, of leaves depends on their morphological, structural and chemical properties, and the capacity to distinguish species remotely may be more successful, taking into account speciesspecific tree architectural traits (Mohammed et al, 2000;Noble and Brown, 2009;Dinuls et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%