Tree height integrated into pantropical forest biomass estimates

Abstract

Aboveground tropical tree biomass and carbon storage estimates commonly ignore tree height (<i>H</i>). We estimate the effect of incorporating <i>H</i> on tropics-wide forest biomass estimates in 327 plots across four continents using 42 656 <i>H</i> and diameter measurements and harvested trees from 20 sites to answer the following questions: <br><br> 1. What is the best <i>H</i>-model form and geographic unit to include in biomass models to minimise site-level uncertainty in estimates of destructive biomass? <br><br> 2. To what extent does including <i>H</i> estimates derived in (1) reduce uncertainty in biomass estimates across all 327 plots? <br><br> 3. What effect does accounting for <i>H</i> have on plot- and continental-scale forest biomass estimates? <br><br> The mean relative error in biomass estimates of destructively harvested trees when including <i>H</i> (mean 0.06), was half that when excluding <i>H</i> (mean 0.13). Power- and Weibull-<i>H</i> models provided the greatest reduction in uncertainty, with regional Weibull-<i>H</i> models preferred because they reduce uncertainty in smaller-diameter classes (≤40 cm <i>D</i>) that store about one-third of biomass per hectare in most forests. Propagating the relationships from destructively harvested tree biomass to each of the 327 plots from across the tropics shows that including <i>H</i> reduces errors from 41.8 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> (range 6.6 to 112.4) to 8.0 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> (−2.5 to 23.0). For all plots, aboveground live biomass was −52.2 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> (−82.0 to −20.3 bootstrapped 95% CI), or 13%, lower when including <i>H</i> estimates, with the greatest relative reductions in estimated biomass in forests of the Brazilian Shield, east Africa, and Australia, and relatively little change in the Guiana Shield, central Africa and southeast Asia. Appreciably different stand structure was observed among regions across the tropical continents, with some storing significantly more biomass in small diameter stems, which affects selection of the best height models to reduce uncertainty and biomass reductions due to <i>H</i>. After accounting for variation in <i>H</i>, total biomass per hectare is greatest in Australia, the Guiana Shield, Asia, central and east Africa, and lowest in east-central Amazonia, W. Africa, W. Amazonia, and the Brazilian Shield (descending order). Thus, if tropical forests span 1668 million km<sup>2</sup> and store 285 Pg C (estimate including <i>H</i>), then applying our regional relationships implies that carbon storage is overestimated by 35 Pg C (31–39 bootstrapped 95% CI) if <i>H</i> is ignored, assuming that the sampled plots are an unbiased statistical representation of all tropical forest in terms of biomass and height ...

Land-use and climate change risks in the Amazon and the need of a novel sustainable development paradigm

“…Although these locations may potentially stock larger carbon pools in the long term, the responses to CO 2 fertilization may be limited due to relative low nutrient availability (137). Despite uncertainties, it has been recognized that the mature forests of the Amazon store around 150 PgC to 200 PgC in their biomass (15), and the forest seems to be acting as an overall carbon sink, with assimilation rates estimated at 0.4 PgC·y −1 (109) over the recent past. Carbon stored in forests each year occurs in the form of growth of branches and trunks, new leaves and roots, and increase of soil organic matter (138).…”

“…The Amazon ecosystems harbor about 10 to 15% of land biodiversity (5,6); its abundant rainfall of about 2.2 m·y −1 makes the region an important heat source for the atmosphere (7), generating an estimated 210,000 m 3 ·s −1 to 220,000 m 3 ·s −1 of river discharge (8,9), which is ∼15% of the freshwater input into the oceans (10); it stores an estimated 150 billion to 200 billion tons of carbon (11)(12)(13)(14)(15); and it presents a mosaic of ethnological and linguistic diversity (16,17).…”

Biomass turnover time in terrestrial ecosystems halved by land use

“…We used mean tree height 72 to downscale national carbon stock data per unit forest area to the 5 arcmin grid. Tree height is a central parameter for the amount of carbon stored in forests, and has been shown to considerably improve the performance of allometric models that are used to quantify tree mass by non-destructive sampling 73,74 . The relative neglect of tree height in allometric approaches is based on the difficulties associated with measuring it 38,74 .…”

Dispersal limitation induces long-term biomass collapse in overhunted Amazonian forests

“…Amazonian forests store ∼125 Pg C in live biomass, or nearly half of the global terrestrial carbon in tropical forests (30), and contribute with ∼15% of the global terrestrial photosynthesis (31). The forests also sustain the highest diversity of fruiting plants (32, 33) and associated mutualists.…”