2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1470-160x(01)00016-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tree basal area and dead wood as surrogate indicators of saproxylic insect faunal integrity: a case study from the Australian lowland tropics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
43
0
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
4
43
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In the cited studies, the 'local scale' refers to a broad range of sampled surfaces, from 0.01 ha to 2 ha. Interestingly, all positive and significant effects predictions of saproxylic beetle richness based on the local amount of deadwood were observed at a scales between 0.5 ha and 1 ha (Grove, 2002;Martikainen et al, 2000;Sippola et al, 2002). In contrast the effect was weak to non-existent when sampling at smaller (i.e.…”
Section: "Environmental" Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the cited studies, the 'local scale' refers to a broad range of sampled surfaces, from 0.01 ha to 2 ha. Interestingly, all positive and significant effects predictions of saproxylic beetle richness based on the local amount of deadwood were observed at a scales between 0.5 ha and 1 ha (Grove, 2002;Martikainen et al, 2000;Sippola et al, 2002). In contrast the effect was weak to non-existent when sampling at smaller (i.e.…”
Section: "Environmental" Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…There are contrasting results on the relevance of physical variables as predictors of saproxylic species richness. Positive correlations between the volume of deadwood and saproxylic beetle richness at the plot level have frequently been observed (Grove, 2002, Martikainen et al, McGeoch et al, 2007Similä et al, 2003;Sippola et al, 2002); however several authors found no relationships between the local amount of deadwood and the richness of saproxylic beetle assemblages (Franc et al, 2007;Økland, et al, 1996;Siitonen, 1994;Similä, et al, 2006;). In our study a portion of the variation in species richness was unexplained by our predictive models.…”
Section: "Environmental" Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our study, however, revealed lower numbers of beetles per cubic meter of wood in the monodominant plantation and the secondary forest than in mature forest. In other tropical forests, saproxylic beetles responded to the characteristics of the forest structure [30,31]. Here, we found that bess beetles' abundance did not respond to the higher availability of wood in the natural regeneration, both as CWD and as standing snags.…”
Section: Speciesmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…count number of hollow oaks). For exemple Grove (2002) used tree basal area and dead wood volume, instead of using species as indicators. However, results from earlier studies are conflicting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%