2000
DOI: 10.1001/archderm.136.6.725
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of Perioral Rhytides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparative studies of different perioral ablative methods are found in the literature: CO 2 laser versus motor 12 or manual dermabrasion 13,14 or Baker‐phenol chemical peeling 15 . Phenol chemical peeling showed, since the 1960s, the best performance, although causing hypopigmentation related to its deep action in the mid‐reticularis dermis 16 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparative studies of different perioral ablative methods are found in the literature: CO 2 laser versus motor 12 or manual dermabrasion 13,14 or Baker‐phenol chemical peeling 15 . Phenol chemical peeling showed, since the 1960s, the best performance, although causing hypopigmentation related to its deep action in the mid‐reticularis dermis 16 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Local anesthesia and sedation, regional nerve blocks, or general anesthesia is generally used secondary to significant intra-operative discomfort. Holmkvist et al (2000) treated half of the perioral area of 15 patients with a pulsed CO 2 laser and the other half with dermabrasion using a hand engine-drive diamond fraise or a medium-grade drywall sanding screen. Dermabrasion resulted in more bleeding during the immediate post-operative period.…”
Section: Ablative Resurfacing Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%