1982
DOI: 10.1001/archderm.118.3.150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of mycosis fungoides: total-skin electron-beam irradiation vs topical mechlorethamine therapy

Abstract: Of 42 patients who had mycosis fungoides (MF) confined to the skin with or without dermatopathic lymphadenopathy, 21 were treated with topically applied mechlorethamine hydrochloride and 21 with total-skin electron-beam irradiation. The results of both therapeutic modalities are compared. We conclude that, in the early stage of the disease, both forms of treatment are equally effective. In the later stages of MF, in the absence of lymph node or other systemic involvement, electron-beam irradiation seems to be … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
1
1

Year Published

1984
1984
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
15
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Total skin electron beam therapy (TSEBT) has been the first, and for a while the only, single effective modality able to cure patients with limited or spreading skin-confined disease. Many authors published encouraging results concerning its feasibility and efficacy, providing remission, stabilization, or palliation of symptoms (2,(5)(6)(7)16). Such a technique is able to deliver a skin surface dose above 30 Gy (usually 35-36 Gy) delivered with electrons of at least 4-MeV (usually 6-MeV) energy (2)(3)(4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total skin electron beam therapy (TSEBT) has been the first, and for a while the only, single effective modality able to cure patients with limited or spreading skin-confined disease. Many authors published encouraging results concerning its feasibility and efficacy, providing remission, stabilization, or palliation of symptoms (2,(5)(6)(7)16). Such a technique is able to deliver a skin surface dose above 30 Gy (usually 35-36 Gy) delivered with electrons of at least 4-MeV (usually 6-MeV) energy (2)(3)(4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this efficacy did not translate into a long-term survival benefit (10-year overall survival (OS), 87 and 87%; p = 0.2). In addition, TSEBT is a reasonable treatment option for patients with T2 and T3 disease owing to its penetration ability, which seems to be superior to that of mechlorethamine [44,45]. TSEBT for T4 disease or SS remains controversial.…”
Section: Tsebt Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these studies evaluated efficacy of aqueous preparations of nitrogen mustard in MF. [33][34][35] In 1982, Hamminga and colleagues 33 reported on a retrospective study of 42 patients with MF, including 10 patients with tumor-stage MF, who were treated with either total-body aqueous mechlorethamine or total-body (skin) electron beam irradiation (TSEB) (2800-3000 rad). Of the patients with early stage MF treated with TSEB, 100% had an initial CR compared with the 82% treated with aqueous mechlorethamine.…”
Section: Topical Chemotherapeutics Mechlorethaminementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lower concentrations should be used when patients show an allergic or irritant reaction. 31,[33][34][35][36] Ointment preparations are made by mixing 10 mg of Mustargen first with 95% alcohol to remove the powder in the vial and then in 100 g of Aquaphor (a nonpolar and anhydrous vehicle with a low incidence of sensitization) to a final concentration of 0.2 mg/mL, which can be applied once daily to the whole body in generalized disease or to lesional skin in localized disease. 31,37,38 It is recommended that application of the medication should occur on dry skin 4 hours before or 30 minutes after showering.…”
Section: Skin-directed Therapies In Ctclmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation