2021
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.643490
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of Lenalidomide Exposed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Network Meta-Analysis of Lenalidomide-Sparing Regimens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter, indeed, also relies on significant epigenetic alterations of different "normal" cell populations within the bone marrow (BM) niche. Accordingly, the most active drugs for MM treatment or for reducing the risk of evolution from sMM to MM include agents with strong activity on the microenvironment, such as immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) or monoclonal antibodies [10,11]. In this context, much evidence supports the critical role played by stromal cells [12,13] and different cells of the IM (such as dendritic cells [14], myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) [15,16], natural killer [17], and specific lymphocytes subclasses including the pro-inflammatory Th17 cells [18,19]) as well as BM-extrinsic drivers such as the microbiota [20] in driving MM evolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter, indeed, also relies on significant epigenetic alterations of different "normal" cell populations within the bone marrow (BM) niche. Accordingly, the most active drugs for MM treatment or for reducing the risk of evolution from sMM to MM include agents with strong activity on the microenvironment, such as immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) or monoclonal antibodies [10,11]. In this context, much evidence supports the critical role played by stromal cells [12,13] and different cells of the IM (such as dendritic cells [14], myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) [15,16], natural killer [17], and specific lymphocytes subclasses including the pro-inflammatory Th17 cells [18,19]) as well as BM-extrinsic drivers such as the microbiota [20] in driving MM evolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, the pharmacological scenario of RRMM is constantly changing, crowded with new drugs, that is, novel PI (ixazomib and carfilzomib), IMiDs (pomalidomide), monoclonal antibodies (daratumumab, isatuximab, and elotuzumab), and other biological drugs 17 . Therefore, choosing the best treatment in this setting is very complicated in clinical practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the latter, in fact, the results in terms of PFS are consistent with the findings from randomized clinical trials (lenalidomide-refractory patients treated with Kd at the second or third relapse had a median PFS of 8.8 months 22 ) and from real world, 23 in a population considered to be at high risk (for which, even when treated with different regimens, the reported median PFS is about 9 months) and which still represents an unmet medical need to date. 24 We also consider the studied scheme to be valid considering the risk profile. When compared to the registration study, dose reduction for adverse events occurred at a slightly different rate (23% vs. 30%); in no case we reported neuropathy, which was the most expected adverse event for first-generation PI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%