2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2021.119324
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of CS2 in waste gas from rubber refining by gas cyclone-liquid jet separator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the two-film theory, mass transfer is dominated by the gas film for both SO 2 and NO. , K G is approximately equal to k G , as shown in formulas and . In addition, as both the flue gas and the injected absorbent were rotating in the GLAS, the back-mixing could be ignored, the absorbent and the flue gas in the GLAS could be regarded as the plug flow, and the total mass transfer coefficient K G a for both SO 2 and NO could be calculated through formula ; H is the Henry coefficient, kPa·m 3 ·mol –1 ; k G is the mass transfer parameter of the gas phase, kmol·m –2 ·s –1 ·kPa –1 ; k L is the mass transfer parameter of the liquid phase, kmol·m –2 ·s –1 ·kPa –1 ; K G a is the overall mass transfer coefficient of the gas phase, mol·m –3 ·s –1 ·Pa –1 ; t is the gas–liquid contact time, s; R is the ideal gas constant, 8.314 J·mol –1 ·K –1 ; T is temperature, K; V G is the gas flow rate, m 3 ·s –1 ; and V mid is the clearance volume of GLAS, m 3 . …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…According to the two-film theory, mass transfer is dominated by the gas film for both SO 2 and NO. , K G is approximately equal to k G , as shown in formulas and . In addition, as both the flue gas and the injected absorbent were rotating in the GLAS, the back-mixing could be ignored, the absorbent and the flue gas in the GLAS could be regarded as the plug flow, and the total mass transfer coefficient K G a for both SO 2 and NO could be calculated through formula ; H is the Henry coefficient, kPa·m 3 ·mol –1 ; k G is the mass transfer parameter of the gas phase, kmol·m –2 ·s –1 ·kPa –1 ; k L is the mass transfer parameter of the liquid phase, kmol·m –2 ·s –1 ·kPa –1 ; K G a is the overall mass transfer coefficient of the gas phase, mol·m –3 ·s –1 ·Pa –1 ; t is the gas–liquid contact time, s; R is the ideal gas constant, 8.314 J·mol –1 ·K –1 ; T is temperature, K; V G is the gas flow rate, m 3 ·s –1 ; and V mid is the clearance volume of GLAS, m 3 . …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the absorbent continuously swirls inside the GLAS, making it less prone to scaling and clogging, which facilitates installation and maintenance. 42,43 The high mass transfer coefficient indicates that GLAS can achieve a high removal efficiency with a cheap NaClO solution and with a small volume. Therefore, GLAS has great application prospects for marine ships.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Numerous solvent naphtha desulfurization technologies have been developed, with dry and wet desulfurization being the most prominent ones. As a widely used desulfurization process, amine desulfurization has a good desulfurization effect, minimal solvent loss, and low corrosion to equipment . However, solvent naphtha and MDEA are fully mixed in the lye tank during the desulfurization process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%