Treatment failure in psychotherapy: The pull of hostility

Abstract

Client-therapist interactions were studied in 14 positive-change (PC) and 14 negative-change or nonchange (NC) therapies with the same therapists and similar clients. Aggregated structural analysis of social behavior (SASB) scores showed increasingly dissimilar interaction styles between client and therapist in NC therapies. First-lag transition analyses of SASB codings of Sessions 3, 12, and 20 showed the following differences: Stable hostile complementarity characterized NC within and across sessions. Hostile complementarity was nevertheless relatively rare. Therapists met clients' invitations to hostile responses most frequently in nonhostile ways, yet they initiated more belittling and ignoring interactions with NC clients, pointing to the subtly hostile therapeutic climate created. Rejection of therapists' interventions predicted negative outcome most strongly and escalated with time. Clients' skepticism may make therapists vulnerable to feelings of inadequacy and, if not dealt with therapeutically, may easily release the therapists' own hostility.

Quality assurance of specialised treatment of eating disorders using large‐scale internet‐based collection systems: Methods, results and lessons learned from designing the Stepwise database

“…Research on outcome prediction, treatment dropout and patient-therapist interaction supports the importance of measuring SASB self-image variables in ED (e.g. Birgegård, Björck, Norring, Sohlberg, & Clinton, 2009;Björck, Clinton, Sohlberg, & Norring, 2007Von der Lippe, Monsen, Rønnestad, & Eilertsen, 2008).…”

The voices of fellow travellers: Experienced therapists' strategies when facing difficult therapeutic impasses

“…Lack of management of counter‐transference reactions and therapist misunderstanding of the patients' problems or needs can lead to poor working alliance (Gelso & Hayes, 2007; Hayes et al , 1998; Rhodes, Hill, Thompson, & Elliott, 1994). Von der Lippe, Monsen, Rønnestad, and Eilertsen (2008) reported from their study of 28 psychotherapy processes where 14 had poor outcome. They found that the therapist–patient interaction in the negative outcome group was characterized by a growing complementary hostility, and that level of hostility in session 12 predicted the poor outcome.…”

Relasjonens betydning i psykoterapi

“…En vedvarende avvisning av å anerkjenne terapeutens kompetanse gjorde trolig denne mer utsatt for å reagere med mer eller mindre subtil fiendtlighet og avvisning tilbake. Dette ble antatt å vaere hovedårsa-ken til det dårlige utfallet for disse pasientene (17).…”