Tratamiento quirúrgico de la osteoartritis en la cadera: actualidades en artroscopia de cadera

Sánchez, Víctor M Ilizaliturri; Galindo, Javier Camacho

doi:10.1016/s1699-258x(07)73655-0

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…OA of the hip may present clinically with evidence of impingement, pain, and stiffness which might potentially be treated with arthroscopy [ 8 ]. Previous reports of its use in patients with OA of the hip have suggested that an improvement in outcome scores can be achieved, although with a 16% to 52% conversion to total hip replacement (THR) [ 9 – 12 ]. However, many patients are reluctant to consider a joint replacement as a suitable option, especially those who are young.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Outcome of Arthroscopy in Patients with Advanced Osteoarthritis of the Hip

2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Hip arthroscopy has continued to expand its horizons in treating many conditions other than femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). However, the results of hip arthroscopy are known to be poor if the degree of articular cartilage damage is significant. We wanted to assess, whether the procedure might have a role in the management of young and active patients with advanced osteoarthritis (OA) and whether it should be offered as a treatment modality. 77 consecutive patients with Tönnis grade 2 and 3 osteoarthritis of the hip who had undergone hip arthroscopy were included in the study. Patients' medical notes, plain radiographs and outcome scores (modified Harris hip score (mHHS), non-arthritic hip score (NAHS)) preoperatively and postoperatively at six weeks, six months, one year and annually thereafter, were analysed. 77 patients consisted of 63 men and 14 women with mean follow-up of 2.8 years (2.2 to 4.2) and mean age at surgery of 43 years (19 to 64). The mean preoperative mHHS and NAHS scores were 58 (28 to 87) and 64 (27 to 93) respectively. The mean improvements in both the mHHS and NAHS scores were significant (p = 0.003 and p = 0.0001 for mHHS at one and two years, p = 0.002 and p = 0.0003 for NAHS at one and two years, respectively). There were 34 patients (44%) who required a total hip replacement at mean of 18 months (6 to 48) after hip arthroscopy. We conclude that hip arthroscopy improves outcome scores in 56% of patients with severe OA of the hip (Tönnis grade 2 and 3) for at least two years after surgery. We thus consider the procedure to be a reasonable option for patients with hip OA, although success of the procedure will be less than if undertaken for certain other conditions.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%