2015
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.91.245311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trap-limited carrier recombination in single-walled carbon nanotube heterojunctions with fullerene acceptor layers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
75
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
4
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both transient decay profiles are fitted using a biexponential function with time constants τ i and associated amplitudes a i of τ 1 =27 ns ( a 1 =0.75) and τ 2 =212 ns ( a 2 =0.25), and yield the average lifetime τ avg of 161 ns, from τ avg =Σ i f i τ i , where f i is the fractional contribution of each time constant, which is ( a i τ i )/Σ j a j τ j . The different transient decay behaviour between solution-phase individualized SWCNTs and thin-film SWCNTs suggest that inter-tube junctions in SWCNT thin films possibly facilitate carrier recombination by serving as recombination sites 42 . In contrast, the longer-lived solution-phase TRMC transient decay dynamics probably represent more intrinsic intra-tube carrier-recombination dynamics, as inter-tube contact is prohibited in the highly individualized SWCNTs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both transient decay profiles are fitted using a biexponential function with time constants τ i and associated amplitudes a i of τ 1 =27 ns ( a 1 =0.75) and τ 2 =212 ns ( a 2 =0.25), and yield the average lifetime τ avg of 161 ns, from τ avg =Σ i f i τ i , where f i is the fractional contribution of each time constant, which is ( a i τ i )/Σ j a j τ j . The different transient decay behaviour between solution-phase individualized SWCNTs and thin-film SWCNTs suggest that inter-tube junctions in SWCNT thin films possibly facilitate carrier recombination by serving as recombination sites 42 . In contrast, the longer-lived solution-phase TRMC transient decay dynamics probably represent more intrinsic intra-tube carrier-recombination dynamics, as inter-tube contact is prohibited in the highly individualized SWCNTs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Charge transfer (CT) exciton is a key to resolve a long-standing exciton dissociation problem in organic solar cells [1][2][3]. Although several effects such as interface dipole [4][5][6], disorder [7][8][9], carrier delocalization [10,11], effective mass [12], and entropy [13][14][15][16] have been investigated to understand why the CT exciton dissociates into free carriers efficiently at the dielectric interface, a physics behind the dissociation remains under debate. The CT exciton has been modeled as a pair of a mobile electron in the acceptor and a completely localized hole in the donor or vice versa [4,5,11,12,[16][17][18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This corresponds to taking both the limit of an infinite hole mass m h → ∞ and a strong localization σ z → 0, which leads to M → ∞, µ → m e , and R → r h . This treatment may be valid if one of the two phases is disordered [7][8][9][10][11]. Using Eq.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 109 ] The SWNT–C 60 bilayer configuration formed type‐II heterojunctions by inducing a sufficient driving force for ET from the donor species, the SWNTs, and the C 60 acceptor molecules. [ 109–111 ] Excitons that were produced by photoexcitation of the first or second SWNT exciton transitions (S 11 and S 22 ,) diffused to the SWNT–C 60 interface, where exciton dissociation occurred [ 112,113 ] due to ultrafast ET. [ 109 ] In contrast, discerning the excitation states of the C 60 layer was accomplished using pump pulses which were resonant with C 60 excitonic transitions, and which can also boost exciton dissociations due to photoinduced hole transfer (PHT).…”
Section: Carbon Nanohybridsmentioning
confidence: 99%