1996
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-0297-8_66
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transverse Velocity Structure Functions in Developed Turbulence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
22
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
4
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The above derivation indicates that it applies equally to both longitudinal and transverse moments. This result, therefore, supports the view expressed in [16], where experimental data is discussed which indicates that the transverse and longitudinal velocity increments do, indeed, have the same global statistics. It also agrees with the known isotropic relations between transverse and longitudinal moments [2] for the cases n = 2 and n = 4.…”
Section: (Aunt) = An[recc(r)]n/3 [Ec~(r)jsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The above derivation indicates that it applies equally to both longitudinal and transverse moments. This result, therefore, supports the view expressed in [16], where experimental data is discussed which indicates that the transverse and longitudinal velocity increments do, indeed, have the same global statistics. It also agrees with the known isotropic relations between transverse and longitudinal moments [2] for the cases n = 2 and n = 4.…”
Section: (Aunt) = An[recc(r)]n/3 [Ec~(r)jsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…On the other hand, in [15] results are discussed which show the opposite trend to those described in [ 16], and, in particular, indicate a difference between scaling exponents of a longitudinal and transverse structure functions for higher orders. What this might indicate, not unreasonably, is a limited domain of applicability of approximations based on the Gaussian fixed point for higher order moments.…”
Section: (Aunt) = An[recc(r)]n/3 [Ec~(r)jmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…30,31 Differences have been observed in their scaling, with some authors reporting greater intermittency for the transverse structure functions, 32 and others the opposite. 33 Hence, initial conditions, methodology (particularly identifying the scaling region), inhomogeneity, Reynolds number, and large scale anisotropy may all impact on the results. In a systematic exploration of these effects on jet flow, it was shown that large-scale anisotropy was the primary control, 34 although differences between the longitudinal and transverse structure functions do not necessarily affect the dynamics of the cascade, which can be shown to belong to the same universality class concerning the hierarchical expression of intermittency despite differences in the exponents.…”
Section: A Structure Function and Multifractal Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 ͒ Only recently has it become feasible to calculate reliably other components of velocity structure functions, due to the advances in experimental technology and computer capability. Several experimental studies and DNS [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] have been carried out to determine the TSFs. Most of these results 3,6,7,[9][10][11][12] agree that there exist significant differences between scaling exponents of LSFs and those of TSFs for moment orders higher than three.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TSFs exhibit more intense intermittency than the LSFs. However, there also exist some different conclusions, 4,5,8 which argue that the differences of scaling exponents in experiments and DNS violate the isotropic constraint and attribute to the effects to finite scaling range. 13 A minimal condition for isotropic turbulence is that the scaling exponents for the second-order LSF and TSF must be the same.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%