2017
DOI: 10.5194/nhess-2017-96
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transposing an active fault database into a seismic hazard fault model for nuclear facilities – Part A: Building a database of potentially active faults (BDFA) for metropolitan France

Abstract: Abstract. The French Radioprotection and Nuclear Safety Institute (IRSN), with the support of the Ministry of Environment, compiled a database (BDFA) in order to define and characterize known potentially active faults of metropolitan France. The general structure of BDFA is presented in this paper. BDFA contains to date a total of 136 faults and represent a first step toward the implementation of seismic source models that would be used for both deterministic and probabilistic hazard calculations. An example t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1) in the immediate vicinity of the NE-SW trending La Rouvière fault (LRF) 4 . This fault was not identified as a potentially active fault in the French Active Fault database (BDFA) 5 . Only the two main bounding faults of the CFS, called the Cevennes Fault (CF) and the Marsanne Fault (MF) (see Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1) in the immediate vicinity of the NE-SW trending La Rouvière fault (LRF) 4 . This fault was not identified as a potentially active fault in the French Active Fault database (BDFA) 5 . Only the two main bounding faults of the CFS, called the Cevennes Fault (CF) and the Marsanne Fault (MF) (see Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1), were considered as potentially active left-lateral strike-slip faults, based on preliminary interpretations of offset geomorphic markers or variations of thickness in quaternary deposits (see ref. 5…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potentially active faults are from the BDFA database (Jomard et al, 2017). Epicentral locations of the November 11, 2019 provided by various seismological centers (red stars).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3a). These two faults are included in the Potentially Active Faults Data Base (BDFA ; Jomard et al, 2017). The InSAR interferogram indicates uplift of the SE block and subsidence of the NW one, i.e.…”
Section: The Mw 49 Le Teil Earthquake: Rapid Information On Earthquamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the scale of metropolitan France (i.e., not including the French overseas territories, several of which experience significant seismic activity), discriminating whether a fault is considered as active is still not straightforward and may depend on scientific or regulatory issues (Jomard et al, 2017). The database of potentially active faults (BDFA) includes faults showing evidence of Miocene or younger deformation, assuming the tectonic stress field has not experienced dramatic changes since the end of the Miocene (Jomard et al, 2017;Mazotti et al, 2020). The BDFA aims at recognizing potential seismogenic faults within 50 km of nuclear facilities.…”
Section: -Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%