Transportation Mode Selection for Organ Transplant Networks by a New Multi-Criteria Group Decision Model Under Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Uncertainty

Salimian, Sina; Mousavi, Seyed Meysam; Turskis, Zenonas

doi:10.15388/23-infor513

Cited by 5 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 39 publications

(40 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…-Even when using the same FUCA method for ranking alternatives, the rankings might differ when using different methods to determine the weights. This also aligns with statements made in various studies [17][18][19].…”

Section: Fig 1 Ranking Of Teacher's Desks and Chairs Setssupporting

confidence: 91%

The Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method: Selection of Support Equipment for Classroom Instructors

Vo,

Pham

2023

Applied Engineering Letters

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This research illustrates the application of the MCDM (Multi-Criteria Decision Making) method in education, specifically in the context of selecting supportive equipment for classroom instructors, as detailed below. The study aims to determine the optimal equipment to assist instructors in their teaching activities. The research is centered around classrooms within a university in Vietnam. Two MCDM methods, namely the FUCA (Faire Un Choix Adéquat) method and the CURLI (Collaborative Unbiased Rank List Integration) method, were employed to select the most suitable equipment options available in the market. The recommended quantities for the respective equipment are 4, 12, and 5, with 5, 12, and 10 evaluation criteria for each type. Notably, the optimal solutions obtained through the FUCA method align with those derived from the CURLI method for each type of equipment. The findings of this study can be leveraged to conduct further research on teaching methodologies, textbook selection, equipment choices for practical exercises, and various other aspects within the field of education.

show abstract

Section: Fig 1 Ranking Of Teacher's Desks and Chairs Setssupporting

confidence: 91%

The Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method: Selection of Support Equipment for Classroom Instructors

Vo,

Pham

2023

Applied Engineering Letters

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…-the ranking results of forklifts are not exactly the same when using different weight methods. This issue has also been mentioned in many previous documents [4,22,23];…”

Section: Discussion Of the Ranking Results Of Forkliftsmentioning

confidence: 55%

Forklift selection by multi-criteria decision-making methods

Dua

2023

EEJET

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A forklift is a very important and common equipment for transporting materials in many different locations such as workshops, warehouses, supermarkets, etc. This equipment has the effects of reducing labor consumption of workers, ensuring the safety of goods and improving labor efficiency. That is why forklift selection is very important. In order to choose a forklift, it is necessary to consider many parameters such as lifting capacity, lifting height, travel speed, safety level, price, maintenance cost, level of impact on the environment, ease of use, etc. However, today there are many types of forklifts on the market, these forklifts have different specifications and prices, making it difficult for shoppers to choose a product in many available types. This study has applied multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods for forklift selection. Two MCDM methods having been used are the COCOSO (Combined Compromise Solution) method and PIV (Proximity Indexed Value) method. Two different methods having also been used to calculate the weights for the criteria are the ENTROPY method and MEREC (Method based on the Removal Effects of Criteria) method. The selection of the best type of forklift applies to the six available types. Six criteria having been used to describe each alternative are lifting height, maximum lifting height, minimum lifting height, fork length, fork width, and price. Each MCDM method will be used in combination with two weight methods. Thus, the ranking results of forklifts are shown in four different series of numbers. An amazing result has occurred that the best and worst forklifts have been consistently determined to be the same in all cases examined. This is the outstanding advantage of the COCOSO and PIV methods compared to other MCDM methods.

show abstract

“…The MEAN weight method is the method where the weights of criteria are equal [14,17,36]. The CRITIC method is used to calculate the weights of criteria according to equations ( 14) and ( 15) [29], [30], [31], [32], [33].…”

Section: The Weighting Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The second weighting method that has been used is the CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) method. This is the weighting method for criteria that consider the correlation between criteria [29], [30], [31], [32], [33].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of MCDM methods effectiveness in the selection of plastic injection molding machines

Trung,

Dudić,

Duc

et al. 2024

Teknomekanik

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In each specific problem of finding the best solution among many available options, where each option has multiple criteria, multi criteria decision making methods are considered equally effective when they converge to the same optimal solution. Proximity Indexed Value, Preference Selection Index, Faire Un Choix Adéquat (in French), and Collaborative Unbiased Rank List Integration are four Multi Criteria Decision Making methods with very different characteristics. All these four methods have been used a lot in recent times. The effectiveness of these four methods have been confirmed to be comparable to other multi criteria decision making methods in many applications. However, the comparison of these four methods with each other has never been performed in any studies. This article is performed to fill that gap. These four methods have been used to find to the best option among five types of plastic injection molding machine. Ten criteria have been chosen to describe each alternative. Two different methods that have been used to calculate the weights for the criteria are the MEAN weight method and the CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation weight method. Different scenarios have been created to compare the effectiveness of these four methods. The results have shown that the four multi criteria decision making methods mentioned above are equally effective in the selection of plastic injection molding machines. Among the five types of plastic injection molding machines, namely JSW J350EII-SPA ANBE-002-02, Meiki M-200B-SJ, Meiki M-350C-DF-SJ, JSW J350E II, and JSW J550E-C5, the JSW J550E-C5 is the best type.

show abstract

Transportation Mode Selection for Organ Transplant Networks by a New Multi-Criteria Group Decision Model Under Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Uncertainty

Cited by 5 publications

References 39 publications

The Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method: Selection of Support Equipment for Classroom Instructors

The Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method: Selection of Support Equipment for Classroom Instructors

Forklift selection by multi-criteria decision-making methods

Comparison of MCDM methods effectiveness in the selection of plastic injection molding machines

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About