2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2013.02.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transportable, fast and high sensitive near real-time analyzers: Formaldehyde detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
53
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Controlled gaseous formaldehyde concentrations were generated by a formaldehyde source previously developed in our laboratory [27,30] and operating typically at a total flow rate of 1500-2000 mL min −1 . This formaldehyde source was then connected to the instrument inlet using 6 mm PTFE tubing.…”
Section: First Generation Of Formaldehyde Analyzermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Controlled gaseous formaldehyde concentrations were generated by a formaldehyde source previously developed in our laboratory [27,30] and operating typically at a total flow rate of 1500-2000 mL min −1 . This formaldehyde source was then connected to the instrument inlet using 6 mm PTFE tubing.…”
Section: First Generation Of Formaldehyde Analyzermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, formaldehyde has been identified as a major cause of sick building syndrome (SBS), the sufferers exhibit a range of symptoms which appear to be related to the time spent in a particular building [11]. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) determines that formaldehyde is carcinogenic to humans [12]. Consequently, the World Health Organization (WHO) limits exposure to 0.08 ppm (80 ppb) over 30 min [13], while the Chinese Environmental Protection Agency has set a 30 min exposure limit of 0.06 ppm [14].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By considering the baseline drift, we can combine equations (2) and (7) and obtain the relationship between sensor response and the formaldehyde concentration in the gas phase, given by sensor response = slope sampling − slope baseline (9) = K • K ad • C f ormaldehyde From equation (9) we can find that the sensor response is directly proportional to the concentration of formaldehyde in the gas sample. …”
Section: (4)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome the drawbacks of the above detection technologies, various other approaches have been developed [7], but each has its own limitations. One of the approaches is based on photoionization detection (PID) [8], [9], which does not have the needed selectivity, and is prone to interference from a wide range of household products.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%