2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10021-011-9414-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transport of Carbon and Nitrogen Between Litter and Soil Organic Matter in a Northern Hardwood Forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
82
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
82
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The labeling process was described by Fahey et al (2011). Briefly, sugar maple saplings were fertilized with 99 atom % enriched 15 NH 4 Cl (0.25g 15 N/m 2 ) during the summer growing season.…”
Section: Leaf Pack Deployment and Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The labeling process was described by Fahey et al (2011). Briefly, sugar maple saplings were fertilized with 99 atom % enriched 15 NH 4 Cl (0.25g 15 N/m 2 ) during the summer growing season.…”
Section: Leaf Pack Deployment and Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At Stonecrop Creek, it is a major species along the stream but, at the other sites, red maple (Acer rubrum) is more common. These two species are closely related, and the decomposition dynamics of both have been well studied (e.g., Petersen and Cummins 1974, Eggert and Wallace 2003, Carter and Suberkropp 2004, Das et al 2007, Fahey et al 2011.…”
Section: Leaf Pack Deployment and Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other methods such as repeated pulse labeling 16 and foliar application or wicking 17,18 do not produce uniformly isotope labeled plant material, nor clear differential labeling of specific C-compounds (e.g. metabolic vs. structural) 19 . An important consideration in isotope labeling is labeling efficiency, due to the high cost of rare isotope enriched compounds used in labeling.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These mechanisms include: (1) fundamental differences in the physical redistribution of surface litter by earthworm feeding and burrowing behavior (Jégou et al 2000;Capowiez et al 2011), and (2) eluviation of isotopically enriched dissolved organic matter into deeper soil layers (Nadelhoffer and Fry 1988;Garten et al 2008). Accelerated leaf litter mass transport from the soil surface observed in this study is likely driven by direct litter consumption by anecic species, while increased transport to A-horizon and burrow soils is enhanced through the bioturbation of mineral soils by endogeic species (Hendriksen 1990;Suárez et al 2006a;Holdsworth et al 2008;Fahey et al 2011Fahey et al , 2013. Comparisons between bulk C:N ratios (black symbols) and litter-derived C:N recovery ratios (grey symbols) across a soil pools: A-horizon, B-horizon, and Burrow soil, and b earthworm species biomass: A. trapezoides (Endogeic = mineral soil feeding and dwelling), E. fetida (Epigeic = litter feeding, surface-dwelling), and L. terrestris (Anecic = litter feeding, vertical burrowing).…”
Section: Acer Rubrum C and N Recoveries In Soil Poolsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Acer rubrum 13 C and 15 N recoveries in soils and earthworm biomass We calculated A. rubrum litter 13 C and 15 N transport into soil and earthworm biomass pools using elemental pool sizes, and increases in 13 C and 15 N content of pools following leaf litter additions (i.e., 13 C and 15 N excess); this approach assumes no changes over time in 13 C and 15 N natural abundance in the pools considered (Nadelhoffer and Fry 1994;Fahey et al 2011).…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%