2007
DOI: 10.1590/s0004-282x2007000700014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transoral approach to the craniovertebral junction

Abstract: -The transoral approach provides a safe exposure to lesions in the midline and the ventral side of the craniovertebral junction. The advantages of the transoral approach are 1) the impinging bony pathology and granulation tissue are accessible only via the ventral route; 2) the head is placed in the extended position, thus decreasing the angulation of the brainstem during the surgery; and 3) surgery is done through the avascular median pharyngeal raphe and clivus. We analyzed the clinical effects of odontoidec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This process avoided the morbidity of a second approach (velopalatal insufficiency, CSF fistula, wound problems, etc.) [6,7] in patients who already had swallowing difficulty. Goel and Desai [24] described good clinical outcomes in posterior fossa decompression alone in patients with reduced posterior cranial fossa volume secondary to various causes including a large anterior odontoid.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This process avoided the morbidity of a second approach (velopalatal insufficiency, CSF fistula, wound problems, etc.) [6,7] in patients who already had swallowing difficulty. Goel and Desai [24] described good clinical outcomes in posterior fossa decompression alone in patients with reduced posterior cranial fossa volume secondary to various causes including a large anterior odontoid.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Often these patients are treated with transoral-transpharyngeal odontoid resection. Although effective in alleviating symptoms, this treatment is associated with significant morbidity and mortality including the need for tracheostomy and gastrostomy, velopalatal insufficiency, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak [6,7]. Consequently, we offer posterior cervical decompression with occipitocervical (OC) fusion to these patients.…”
Section: Background/aimsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,19,21,28,38 Rates of significant upper respiratory tract edema requiring intervention following transoral approaches have been reported in up to 5% of adults and 4% of children, but this rate may be artificially low due to a more cautious timetable for extubation. 6,9,13,20,26,27,36,39,40 Additionally, an endoscopic transnasal approach may allow for a more prompt return to a normal oral diet. 21,24 The incidence of new-onset dysphagia after a traditional transoral approach ranges from 0%-20% in adults and 0%-4% in the pediatric population, which is not unexpected given the dissection of the posterior pharyngeal tissues that is required.…”
Section: Advantages and Disadvantages Of The Endoscopic Transnasal Apmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 This approach is most commonly used for bony tumors (clivus chordoma), atlanto-axial pathology (subluxation and odontoid fracture), and vascular pathology (basilar artery aneurysm) and basilar invagination. [1][2][3][4] The trans-oral approach was first described in 1909 by Kanavel when he used it to access a bullet at the craniocervical junction. 1 Many have suggested modifications, with the current technique being attributed to Crockard and colleagues 1,2 and Menezes and VanGilder.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%