Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
20
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[27][28][29] In addition, the NUTRIC score has been validated by independent investigators in Asian, Brazilian, and Portuguese populations. [30][31][32] In contrast, Arabi and colleagues 33 recently published a post hoc analysis of the Permissive Underfeeding versus Target Enteral Feeding in Critically Ill Adults (PERMIT) trial, where patients were randomized to different levels of caloric intake, and they analyzed the effect with high vs low NUTRIC groups of patients. Consistent with the overall results of the PERMIT trial, 34 they did not demonstrate any differential effect of caloric intake in high vs low NUTRIC patients.…”
Section: Nutrition Risk Assessment In the Critically Illmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[27][28][29] In addition, the NUTRIC score has been validated by independent investigators in Asian, Brazilian, and Portuguese populations. [30][31][32] In contrast, Arabi and colleagues 33 recently published a post hoc analysis of the Permissive Underfeeding versus Target Enteral Feeding in Critically Ill Adults (PERMIT) trial, where patients were randomized to different levels of caloric intake, and they analyzed the effect with high vs low NUTRIC groups of patients. Consistent with the overall results of the PERMIT trial, 34 they did not demonstrate any differential effect of caloric intake in high vs low NUTRIC patients.…”
Section: Nutrition Risk Assessment In the Critically Illmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, this sample comprised patients of a wide range of age and with different diseases. Further investigation is needed to find the best cutoff score for the high-risk group in the modified NUTRIC Score in order to compare our data with the original score used in the Caucasian cohort [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17,18 Uma vantagem do NUTRIC é sua aplicabilidade em situações em que os pacientes estão com a comunicação impossibilitada, como nos casos de ventilação mecânica, uma vez que as variáveis para a pontuação no instrumento são obtidas a partir de dados registrados rotineiramente nos prontuários médicos, justamente pela frequente limitação verbal no paciente crítico. 19 Assim, o NUTRIC parece ser uma ferramenta adequada para a avaliação do risco nutricional do paciente crítico, pois aqueles que apresentam mais disfunções respiratórias, cardíacas, renais, alterações de eletrólitos e nível de consciência reduzido parecem estar mais propensos ao risco nutricional e, portanto, se beneficiariam da terapia nutricional precoce. Apesar disso, o instrumento ainda não é validado para o monitoramento do estado nutricional.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified