2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2019.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transforming Protected Area Management in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
76
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study will contribute to achieving effective protection of natural landscapes in the face of the new protected areas system [35]. In terms of the landscape construction requirements of the new protected area system, national parks mainly protect nationally representative natural landscapes, nature reserves mainly protect natural landscape areas of special significance, and nature parks mainly protect important natural landscapes with aesthetic value [1].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study will contribute to achieving effective protection of natural landscapes in the face of the new protected areas system [35]. In terms of the landscape construction requirements of the new protected area system, national parks mainly protect nationally representative natural landscapes, nature reserves mainly protect natural landscape areas of special significance, and nature parks mainly protect important natural landscapes with aesthetic value [1].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…China should be cautious about reassigning strictly protected areas to less strict ones. Subsequently, this plan may provide a foundation for the delineation of boundaries of all types of protected areas [36]. Management departments should guide and support the aborigines in key areas of giant panda protection to voluntarily and orderly migrate to nearby towns where they can concentrate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates that sampling locations possibly biased the estimated conservation effects in forest structural traits and diversity traits, and our data also confirmed that dominant species abundance was not affected by the sampling distance from the reserve (Table S3). At the moment, different scientists sample at different distances when evaluating conservation effects, and this distance ranges from 2 to 70 km [18][19][20]. Our data strongly suggested that standardized sampling protocol including distance to the reserve should be developed in the future.…”
Section: Conservation-induced Dominant Species Changes With Increasinmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The plot locations outside the reserve were within about 30 km from the edge of the reserve in our study (Figure 1a). This sampling distance in studying the conservation effects ranged from 2 to 70 km in previous references [18][19][20].…”
Section: Experimental Design Field Investigation and Data Dollectionmentioning
confidence: 99%