2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12652-021-03488-z
| View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: Image classification is getting more attention in the area of computer vision. During the past few years, a lot of research has been done on image classification using classical machine learning and deep learning techniques. Presently, deep learningbased techniques have given stupendous results. The performance of a classification system depends on the quality of features extracted from an image. The better is the quality of extracted features, the more the accuracy will be. Although, numerous deep learning-ba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Table 5 and Table 6 , we have presented the performance of transfer learning models such as InceptionV3 [ 31 ], ResNet [ 32 ], VGG16 [ 33 ], CNN [ 34 ], Xception [ 35 ] and VGG19 [ 36 ] to measure how accurately the classifiers can classify the cell types after training it with original and synthetic data separately. We have used precision and recall as evaluation metrics.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Table 5 and Table 6 , we have presented the performance of transfer learning models such as InceptionV3 [ 31 ], ResNet [ 32 ], VGG16 [ 33 ], CNN [ 34 ], Xception [ 35 ] and VGG19 [ 36 ] to measure how accurately the classifiers can classify the cell types after training it with original and synthetic data separately. We have used precision and recall as evaluation metrics.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authors achieved an accuracy of over 80% using ResNet pretrained networks. Authors of the paper [13] used InceptionV3, a special pre-trained network, to identify pulmonary disease. A number of classifiers were used after separating the features, including SVM, softmax, etc., and achieved an accuracy of around 95.41%.…”
Section: Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, this study only uses MFCC as the feature parameter, and the method proposed in the literature can be tried to extract the features of multiple views for bird audios, and birdsongs recognition can be carried out by combining a variety of different feature parameters. Both deep learning and traditional machine learning are now widely used for object recognition 31 33 . Deep learning can also extract low-level features of research objects while classifying.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Scopementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Handcrafted features can retain the characteristics of the research object itself, and combine the features extracted by deep learning with handcrafted features to better express the specific information of the object. Literature 31 explored two methods of deep learning and machine learning, and combined traditional features and CNN features, and achieved good results. In the future, we will conduct feature fusion with the representation features extracted by deep learning and traditional hand-extracted features to improve the accuracy of of birdsongs recognition.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Scopementioning
confidence: 99%