2003
DOI: 10.1097/00024720-200304000-00005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transdiscal L5–S1 Screws for the Fixation of Isthmic Spondylolisthesis: A Biomechanical Evaluation

Abstract: The current study is a biomechanical study using a cadaveric model of L5-S1 spondylolisthesis. The purpose of the current study was to compare, in a cadaveric model of simulated L5-S1 spondylolisthesis, the biomechanical stiffness of transdiscal fixation with traditional pedicle screw fixation, and transdiscal fixation with combined interbody/pedicle screw fixation. The surgical management of L5-S1 spondylolisthesis is a challenge because of the difficulties in achieving a reliable arthrodesis in the face of h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
32
1
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
32
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These authors cited 4 main advantages to this approach: it uses the concept of 3-column fixation achieved from a single posterior approach; it has demonstrated in vivo implementation of superior biomechanical principles, as the triangular construct provides a superior fixation strength; it has better contact with cortical bone; and the use of longer screws and greater penetration provides additional fixation. Subsequent studies of biomechanical properties of the transdiscal approach have demonstrated improvement in resistance against shear forces at the displaced level compared with posterolateral fusion, 4,8 stiffness 1.6-1.8 times higher than that achieved with traditional pedicle screw fixation, 18 and equivalent fixation to that achieved with the combination of interbody fusion and pedicle screw fixation. 23 Another advantage is that a posterior approach is used more frequently in spine surgeries and is more familiar for less-experienced surgeons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These authors cited 4 main advantages to this approach: it uses the concept of 3-column fixation achieved from a single posterior approach; it has demonstrated in vivo implementation of superior biomechanical principles, as the triangular construct provides a superior fixation strength; it has better contact with cortical bone; and the use of longer screws and greater penetration provides additional fixation. Subsequent studies of biomechanical properties of the transdiscal approach have demonstrated improvement in resistance against shear forces at the displaced level compared with posterolateral fusion, 4,8 stiffness 1.6-1.8 times higher than that achieved with traditional pedicle screw fixation, 18 and equivalent fixation to that achieved with the combination of interbody fusion and pedicle screw fixation. 23 Another advantage is that a posterior approach is used more frequently in spine surgeries and is more familiar for less-experienced surgeons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is adequate literature support to show the strength of lumbosacral fixation in presence of highgrade listhesis. 16,17 These screws are as strong as classical 360° circumferential techniques with the additional advantage of them being simple and fast. 12 In addition, the neurological complications associated with partial or total reduction 18 of listhesis are reduced drastically in this method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,7 The transdiscal screw relies on the cortical bone of the pedicle and both adjacent endplates to form the anchorage; therefore, it provides additional benefit in comparison with the traditional pedicle screw. Nottmeier and Pirris described transdiscal screw placement for patients with osteoporosis to improve the screw purchase in the thoracic spine by using spinal navigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,7 In 2004, Mehdizade et al reported percutaneous vertebroplasty via a transdiscal route following transpedicular instrumentation in the lumbar spine. 6 For the thoracic spine, such a procedure has not yet been described.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%