2009
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcriptional Infidelity Promotes Heritable Phenotypic Change in a Bistable Gene Network

Abstract: Bistable epigenetic switches are fundamental for cell fate determination in unicellular and multicellular organisms. Regulatory proteins associated with bistable switches are often present in low numbers and subject to molecular noise. It is becoming clear that noise in gene expression can influence cell fate. Although the origins and consequences of noise have been studied, the stochastic and transient nature of RNA errors during transcription has not been considered in the origin or modeling of noise nor has… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

5
142
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
5
142
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Additional consideration of rifampin resistance alleles, especially those equivalent to S. aureus RpoB-P519L, uncovered yet further evidence of linkage to a wide variety of changes in RNAP transcription properties and their physiological consequences. These alterations include transcription slippage, sign epistasis, Rho-dependent terminator read-through, attenuation bypass, global transcriptome changes, and alterations in metabolic profiles (64)(65)(66)(67)(68)(69)(70)(71)(72)(73)(74)(75)). It appears that common solutions to confront diverse stress conditions have occurred in various organisms, hinting at a potentially fundamental process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional consideration of rifampin resistance alleles, especially those equivalent to S. aureus RpoB-P519L, uncovered yet further evidence of linkage to a wide variety of changes in RNAP transcription properties and their physiological consequences. These alterations include transcription slippage, sign epistasis, Rho-dependent terminator read-through, attenuation bypass, global transcriptome changes, and alterations in metabolic profiles (64)(65)(66)(67)(68)(69)(70)(71)(72)(73)(74)(75)). It appears that common solutions to confront diverse stress conditions have occurred in various organisms, hinting at a potentially fundamental process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vivo measurements of errors in gene expression in bacteria have been estimated to occur at a rate of 10 −4 to 10 −5 per nucleotide during transcription and ≈10 −3 to 10 −4 per codon during translation. These error rates are significantly higher than that attributed to the highfidelity replication process, where the frequency of errors is as low as 10 −8 to 10 −9 per nucleotide (8,9,(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20).…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In more general terms, errors arising spontaneously during gene expression may increase protein variety and thereby enable genetically identical cells to display heterogeneous phenotypes. This phenomenon is likely to contribute to the robustness of unicellular organisms, allowing them to respond to fluctuating environments without changing their genotype (6)(7)(8)(9)(10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Point mutations D675Y in the ␤ subunit and N458D/S in the ␤Ј subunit of E. coli RNAP that reduced fidelity in vitro were also described (14,15). Rifampicin-resistant P564L mutation in the ␤ subunit (also known as ack-1 (9)) was reported to decrease transcription fidelity in vivo and was recently shown to increase molecular noise in E. coli cells because of transient RNA errors (16).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%