2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2012.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcriptional elongation and alternative splicing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
72
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
1
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effects on splicing fidelity of changing transcription rate could reflect less efficient elimination of splicing errors as a result of perturbing cotranscriptional quality control mechanisms, such as kinetic proofreading of splicing (Hopfield 1974;Semlow and Staley 2012). Additionally, altering transcription elongation rate was reported to change multiple properties of nascent RNA and the chromatin environment around sites of active transcription, affecting alternative splicing decisions (Buratti and Baralle 2004;Dujardin et al 2013;Saldi et al 2016). The CTD was recently shown to form multivalent interactions with low-complexity domains in other proteins, including certain splicing factors, suggesting another mechanism by which RNAPII might affect cotranscriptional splicing, by compartmentalizing these two processes (Harlen and Churchman 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects on splicing fidelity of changing transcription rate could reflect less efficient elimination of splicing errors as a result of perturbing cotranscriptional quality control mechanisms, such as kinetic proofreading of splicing (Hopfield 1974;Semlow and Staley 2012). Additionally, altering transcription elongation rate was reported to change multiple properties of nascent RNA and the chromatin environment around sites of active transcription, affecting alternative splicing decisions (Buratti and Baralle 2004;Dujardin et al 2013;Saldi et al 2016). The CTD was recently shown to form multivalent interactions with low-complexity domains in other proteins, including certain splicing factors, suggesting another mechanism by which RNAPII might affect cotranscriptional splicing, by compartmentalizing these two processes (Harlen and Churchman 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence is accumulating that chromatin modifications, transcription, and splicing are highly integrated, each influencing the other (Braunschweig et al, 2013;Dujardin et al, 2013;Gómez Acuña et al, 2013). Multiple aspects associated with transcription, such as promoter strength, transcription factor occupancy, rate of transcription, speed of RNA polymerase, and chromatin modifications, are known to change AS (Braunschweig et al, 2013).…”
Section: As Regulation By Epigenetic Marks On Dna and Histonesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanism of the recruitment model may mainly depend on specific features of CTD (as mentioned above), whereas the kinetic model is based on the different elongation rates of Pol II, which in turn determine the timing of the presentation of splices sites (47,48).…”
Section: Coupling Of Alternative Splicing To Transcriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%