2013
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcriptional basis of the acclimation to high environmental temperature at the olfactory receptor organs of Drosophila melanogaster

Abstract: BackgroundEnvironmental temperature directly affects the concentrations of chemicals in the gas phase. Therefore, if the olfactory system does not physiologically adapt to environmental conditions, it may provide inadequate information about the distance to or direction of odor sources. Previous reports have shown at the behavioral level that temperature induces changes in olfactory sensitivity in Drosophila melanogaster. These changes are initiated in the main olfactory receptor organs, the antennae. In this … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
28
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(93 reference statements)
3
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“… 42 . For the melon fly, the number of IR sequences we identified is higher than those previously reported for other species 43 44 . This larger number may reflect the ecological specificities of the melon fly species, which feeds only on decaying or damaged fruits 45 .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 76%
“… 42 . For the melon fly, the number of IR sequences we identified is higher than those previously reported for other species 43 44 . This larger number may reflect the ecological specificities of the melon fly species, which feeds only on decaying or damaged fruits 45 .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…We identified 154 candidate chemosensory genes (51 ORs, 32 IRs, 14 GRs, 49 OBPs, 6 CSPs and 2 SNMPs) in E. balteatus and 134 (42 ORs, 23 IRs, 16 GRs, 44 OBPs, 7 CSPs and 2 SNMPs) were identified in E. corollae , numbers slightly different compared with those of other Dipteran species [ 50 , 73 , 75 , 76 ]. Such differences could be due to sequencing methods, coverage and/or depth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Open reading frames were predicted using ESTScan 3.0 project. Gene expression levels were estimated by RSEM software 83 , and differential expression analysis of two groups was performed using the DESeq R package (1.10.1) 84 . P-value was adjusted using q-value 85 and q-value < 0.005 and log 2 (fold_change) >1 was set as the threshold for significantly differential expression.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%