1996
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2795(199602)43:2<135::aid-mrd1>3.3.co;2-l
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
Transcriptional activity and nucleolar ultrastructure of embryonic rabbit nuclei after transplantation to enucleated oocytes
Abstract: Changes in the level of transcriptional activity in 32-cell stage morula nuclei were studied after blastomere electrofusion to enucleated oocytes. Nuclear transplant recipients were pulse labelled with 3H-uridine during cultivation in vitro, embryos were then fixed and processed for autoradiography and electron microscopy. Transcriptional activity substantially decreased after 4.5 hr and was completely inhibited at last 15 hr after fusion. Transcription resumed thereafter in two-cell stage embryos and could be…
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
8
0
0
0
Citation Types
0
2
0
0
Year Published
1997
2005
Publication Types
Select...
8
Relationship
0
8
Authors
Journals
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
References 0 publications
0
2
0
0
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Increased detection of newly synthesized heterogeneous nuclear RNA (hnRNA) is also observed in cloned bovine embryos (Lavoir et al, 1997). Ultrastructural analysis of bovine nuclear transfer embryos revealed widespread transcriptional silencing following nuclear transfer, and then transcriptional re‐activation much like normal embryos, but with an excess production of ribosomes (Kanka et al, 1996). Remodelling of the nucleolus in bovine clones has been reported as being more efficient using activated oocytes as recipients as compared with non‐activated oocytes (Kanka et al, 1999).…”
Section: Later Reprogramming Events In Cloned Embryos
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Increased detection of newly synthesized heterogeneous nuclear RNA (hnRNA) is also observed in cloned bovine embryos (Lavoir et al, 1997). Ultrastructural analysis of bovine nuclear transfer embryos revealed widespread transcriptional silencing following nuclear transfer, and then transcriptional re‐activation much like normal embryos, but with an excess production of ribosomes (Kanka et al, 1996). Remodelling of the nucleolus in bovine clones has been reported as being more efficient using activated oocytes as recipients as compared with non‐activated oocytes (Kanka et al, 1999).…”
Section: Later Reprogramming Events In Cloned Embryos
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The molecular basis of reprogramming during cloning is entirely unknown. Although numerous correlates have been examined, such as effects on nuclear matrix proteins (Moreira et al, 2003), nuclear envelope components (Kubiak et al, 1991), nucleolar components (Kanka et al, 1996), and histone proteins (Gao et al, 2004a, and references therein), the actual factors that are responsible for guiding the specific repression and activation of genes in the cloned embryo have not been identified. Additionally, it is clear that reprogramming is only initiated in the oocyte, and then continues during cleavage and subsequent development, raising the question of what reprogramming factors exist in the oocyte, and what specific changes must occur in the oocyte to set the stage for continued reprogramming later.…”
Section: Problems To Address
mentioning
confidence: 99%
