2019
DOI: 10.3390/plants8120531
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcription Factor Networks in Leaves of Cichorium endivia: New Insights into the Relationship between Photosynthesis and Leaf Development

Abstract: Cichorium endivia is a leafy crop closely related to Lactuca sativa that comprises two major botanical varieties characterized by a high degree of intraspecific morphological variation: var. latifolium with broad leaves (escarole) and var. crispum with narrow crisp curly leaves (endive). To investigate the relationship between leaf morphology and photosynthetic activity, escaroles and endives were used as a crop model due to the striking morphological diversity of their leaves. We constructed a leaf database f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The downregulation of LsTCP4 by the insertion led to the severer leaf serration in Empire type cultivars [ 61 ]. However, differential expression analysis between broad- and curly-leaved plants of Cichorium endivia , a close relative of L. sativa that also displayed wavy or serrated leaves, did not identify TCP4-like homologous genes as differentially expressed in leaves with different morphologies, and the two transcripts were abundant in both leaf types [ 62 ]. Tomato forms compound leaves regulated by LACEOLATE ( LA ) homologous to CIN- like TCPs .…”
Section: The Functions Of Cin-like Tcp Transcription Factors In DImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The downregulation of LsTCP4 by the insertion led to the severer leaf serration in Empire type cultivars [ 61 ]. However, differential expression analysis between broad- and curly-leaved plants of Cichorium endivia , a close relative of L. sativa that also displayed wavy or serrated leaves, did not identify TCP4-like homologous genes as differentially expressed in leaves with different morphologies, and the two transcripts were abundant in both leaf types [ 62 ]. Tomato forms compound leaves regulated by LACEOLATE ( LA ) homologous to CIN- like TCPs .…”
Section: The Functions Of Cin-like Tcp Transcription Factors In DImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To identify putative upstream regulators of the differentiation between tolerant and sensitive responses, we selected the TF-encoding DEGs of the four species ( Supplementary File S3 ) and we performed a k-means cluster analysis of the gene expression profiles of the CDT genes together with the TF–DEGs for each species. The optimum cluster number was determined based on converging results of the sum of squared errors (SSE) estimate and the Calinsky criterion, as described by Testone et al [ 58 ]. The analysis defined the presence of four different expression clusters for each species ( Figure 4 , Supplementary File S4 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These genes were positively correlated to SGR ( Table S8 ), fully corroborating the k-means clustering data. Node degree, which, in a GCN network, is the number of neighbours to which a node directly connects, is an important centrality parameter that identifies essential genes in the network [ 58 , 60 ]. In this respect, the GCN analysis identified PsaO, PsaK , and LHCB , with node degrees of 429, 418, and 410 respectively, as hub central genes in the osmotic stress response.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Leaf shape is a complex trait controlled by multiple genes and is of great significance for plant photosynthetic energy storage and resistance to stress ( Testone et al, 2019 ; He P. et al, 2020 ). Teosinte branched1, cycloidea, and proliferating cell factors (TCPs), belonging to the bHLH transcription factor family, are widely involved in leaf morphology regulation ( Aggarwal et al, 2010 ; Zhao M. L. et al, 2020 ; Lan et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%