2002
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2253011572
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcranial Duplex Sonography in the Detection of Patent Foramen Ovale

Abstract: c-TCCS is a sensitive noninvasive method for detecting cardiac right-to-left shunt and is as sensitive as c-TEE.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
4

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
39
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…High-intensity transient signals (HITS) were counted for 25 s after the end of the Valsalva manoeuvre, and the numbers of HITS were classified in one of four categories (zero HITS, 1−10 HITS, >10 HITS without curtain, and curtain) following the Blersch method [4]. TEE was performed by using an echocardiograph device "Philips Sonos 5500" (Andover, MA, USA) equipped with a multi-frequency probe S3 and transoesophageal multi-polar probe.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…High-intensity transient signals (HITS) were counted for 25 s after the end of the Valsalva manoeuvre, and the numbers of HITS were classified in one of four categories (zero HITS, 1−10 HITS, >10 HITS without curtain, and curtain) following the Blersch method [4]. TEE was performed by using an echocardiograph device "Philips Sonos 5500" (Andover, MA, USA) equipped with a multi-frequency probe S3 and transoesophageal multi-polar probe.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique can also detect the morphological features of the shunts, and this is significant because the amplitude of the shunt is related to the embolic entities [3]. Conversely, contract transcranial Doppler (c-TCD) is the most sensitive method to detect R-L shunts, the majority of which are due to PFO [4,5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has the advantage of visualizing the site of the right-to-left shunt together with its mor- phology and hemodynamic significance. TTE has been found to be less sensitive in diagnosing PFO than TEE, although supported by detection of right to left bubble passage after intravenous administration of agitated saline contrast on TMD, its utilization becomes considerable [14,15] TCD, as a noninvasive tool, is a potential alternative to TEE, however it evidences the presence of right-to-left shunt solely without indicating its site [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TCD has been demonstrated to have high sensitivity and specificity for detection of rightto-left shunting when compared to contrast transesophageal echocardiography and is superior to transthoracic echocardiography. [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) with agitated saline has decreased sensitivity of detecting an intracardiac shunt in OSA patients with elevated BMI and large body habitus secondary to limited acoustic windows. 13,21 Using passage of a guide wire across the atrial septum during cardiac catheterization with intracardiac echocardiography guidance as the standard for diagnosing a PFO, TCD has a 98% sensitivity for making the diagnosis of PFO.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TCD is limited by its inability to identify the location of the shunt; however, almost all right-toleft shunts are due to PFOs or small ASDs since other etiologies, such as large trans-pulmonary shunting from pulmonary AVMs, are rare (1% of TCD exams). [15][16][17][18][19][20] Compared with heart catheterization for PFO detection, TCD is more sensitive than TEE since there is a 10% false negative rate with TEE because patients cannot perform a Valsalva maneuver with a TEE probe down their esophagus. 20,[22][23][24] The patients in our study with OSA and PFO did not undergo PFO closure, which would be needed to evaluate a cause and effect relationship.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%