2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.09.088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transapical Versus Transfemoral Aortic Valve Implantation: A Multicenter Collaborative Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
48
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
9
48
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is contrary to that reported in other studies . However, most of the case series are inclusive of the reporting‐center's entire experience . This is an important point because the learning curves of the two techniques may be different.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…This finding is contrary to that reported in other studies . However, most of the case series are inclusive of the reporting‐center's entire experience . This is an important point because the learning curves of the two techniques may be different.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…CHB, Complete heart block; TAVR, transcatheter aortic valve replacement many studies have compared transapical and endovascular approach and the risk of PPM. 10,23,[26][27][28] Most of them showed no statistically significant difference in the need for PPM based on approach. However, parallel to our findings, the study by Fadahunsi et al 23 which included over 9,000 TAVR procedures, showed higher PPM use with endovascular compared to transapical approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…26 These studies underscore the principal difficulty of studying the effect of PAD on TAVR outcomes – PAD is strongly correlated with non-TF access for TAVR, which has a strong association, across multiple studies, with inferior outcomes. 22, 27, 28 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%