2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trajectories of Perioperative Serum Tumor Markers and Colorectal Cancer Outcomes: A Retrospective, Multicenter Longitudinal Cohort Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(35 reference statements)
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, these results were in line with the conclusion that the expression of m 5 C signatures in CRC tissue was related to different clinical outcomes and tumor status found by other researchers (19). It might be since with the development of the stage, more tumor cells were released into the blood during epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), affecting the phenotype of immune cells (27)(28)(29).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, these results were in line with the conclusion that the expression of m 5 C signatures in CRC tissue was related to different clinical outcomes and tumor status found by other researchers (19). It might be since with the development of the stage, more tumor cells were released into the blood during epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), affecting the phenotype of immune cells (27)(28)(29).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The blood tumor biomarkers CEA, CA19-9, and CA125, were broadly employed for physical screening of CRC ( 7 ). However, these three indicators were more appropriate for postoperative risk monitoring in CRC patients due to their lower sensitivity ( 30 ). Our results displayed that m 5 C modification discriminated between CRC patients and healthy recipients with an AUC of 0.888 (95% CI, 0.835-0.941), was substantially superior to that of CEA (0.739; 95% CI, 0.660-0.818), CA19-9 (0.669; 95% CI, 0.583-0.755), and CA125 (0.629; 95% CI, 0.540-0.718) for AUC in the training set ( Figure 2C ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding is consistent with previous studies and anticipated outcomes (25,46,47). The severity of the tumor burden and inflammatory response mirrors the progression of MLBO (48)(49)(50). This congruence further supports the robustness of our predictive model and accentuates the significance of these factors in determining the prognosis of MLBO patients.…”
Section: /42supporting
confidence: 91%
“…The commonly used methods for the diagnosis and prognosis of cancers are (1) imaging examination: including X-ray, CT, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasound, endoscopy, glucose metabolism technology and positron emission tomography (PET), radionuclide imaging examination and other imaging methods [ 3 , 4 , 5 ]; (2) molecular marker examination: including detection of tumor markers such as carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), and various carbohydrate antigens (such as CA125 and CA19) and some tumor-related biochemical indicators such as acid phosphatase (ACP), estrogen receptor (ER), and progesterone receptor (PR) in serum urine of patients [ 4 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ]; (3) pathological examination where the abnormal tissue samples are collected for pathological examination by techniques such as immunohistochemistry (IHC), HE staining, and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) [ 10 , 11 ]; (4) detection of circulating tumor cells (CTC), such as detection of tumor cells in peripheral blood, which can be used to monitor and predict the prognosis of tumor metastasis [ 12 , 13 ]; (5) body fluid cytological diagnosis, including detection of tumor cells by sputum, urine and other liquids or by means of puncture [ 14 , 15 ]; and (6) other examinations: including digital rectal examination (DRE), fecal occult blood test (FOBT), and other diagnostic methods [ 16 , 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%