2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.cjco.2022.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trajectories of Cardiac Function Following Treatment With an Impella Device in Patients With Acute Anterior ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This case report illustrates the benefits of Impella for complex PCIs in comparison to medical management only. The Impella device is gaining popularity in high-risk PCIs because it provides adequate sustenance in hemodynamic circulation by improving pressure and providing about 3.5 l/min of cardiac output [5][6][7]. Although this device has obtained approval in the US and Europe, its use in the UK is currently constrained by factors like the device's price, limited long-term clinical outcome data, and shortage of experienced staff [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This case report illustrates the benefits of Impella for complex PCIs in comparison to medical management only. The Impella device is gaining popularity in high-risk PCIs because it provides adequate sustenance in hemodynamic circulation by improving pressure and providing about 3.5 l/min of cardiac output [5][6][7]. Although this device has obtained approval in the US and Europe, its use in the UK is currently constrained by factors like the device's price, limited long-term clinical outcome data, and shortage of experienced staff [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decreased MVO 2 due to mechanical unloading also has profound long-term consequences. For example, implantation of Impella within 24 h in patients with anterior ST-segment myocardial infarction is associated with an increased left ventricular ejection fraction after ∼4 months from index event compared to control ( 50 ). The Protect II randomised controlled trial, showed that Impella provided greater CO power, a metric correlated to mortality ( 51 ), compared to other mechanical support devices in cardiogenic shock patients ( 52 ).…”
Section: Mechanical Circulatory Support Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%