2003
DOI: 10.1038/sj.jea.7500276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Traffic density in California: Socioeconomic and ethnic differences among potentially exposed children

Abstract: Motor vehicles are the main source of many hazardous air pollutants in California. Previous studies have shown that low-income and minority populations are more likely to live near industrial sources of pollution and in areas that do not meet national air quality standards. We estimated neighborhood exposures to motor vehicle emissions from a road network with daily traffic counts using a geographic information system. To calculate traffic density, we summed the average daily vehicle miles of travel per square… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
135
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
6
135
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of existing research examining socioeconomic status (SES) and air pollution exposure focuses on how lower SES is associated with higher smoking rates (Watson et al, 2003), greater occupational exposures (Rotko et al, 2000), and residences located in areas that have higher ambient air pollution (Gunier et al, 2003;O'neill et al, 2003;Jerrett et al, 2004). This is the first study that has found links between low improved building value, which is likely related to low SES, and increased F inf of ambient PM 2.5 air pollution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The majority of existing research examining socioeconomic status (SES) and air pollution exposure focuses on how lower SES is associated with higher smoking rates (Watson et al, 2003), greater occupational exposures (Rotko et al, 2000), and residences located in areas that have higher ambient air pollution (Gunier et al, 2003;O'neill et al, 2003;Jerrett et al, 2004). This is the first study that has found links between low improved building value, which is likely related to low SES, and increased F inf of ambient PM 2.5 air pollution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Traffic density has been estimated at the county level, 5 the census block level, 44 and within selected radii (50-300 m) of a residence 10,11,30 using publically or commercially available sources or some combination thereof. The traffic density estimate may be based on only those roads for which actual traffic volume data are collected, 11,44 or traffic volumes may be assigned to neighboring roads using models or comparison to roads with similar capacities. 10,36 In one study, publically available data on roadway networks and traffic volumes were used to develop geographic information system (GIS)-derived cumulative traffic density scores identifying roads with greater than 8,500 cars/day.…”
Section: Rationale For Using Surrogate Methods For Characterizing Tramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36 Data obtained from 93 state monitoring stations for CO, benzene, and 1,3-butadiene showed stronger correlations with census block level traffic density (correlation coefficients, 0.70, 0.69, and 0.57, respectively). 44 Possible explanations for these inconsistent results include spatial or temporal misalignment of the monitoring data and traffic density estimates or difference in the relative contribution of traffic versus non-traffic sources to parameter concentrations in a particular locale. Land-use regression studies combine monitoring of air pollution at a small number of locations and development of stochastic models using data on land use, traffic characteristics, and meteorology to predict measured pollution concentrations at un-sampled locations.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Weiland et al (1994) use this term in conjunction with self-described truck-traffic frequencies and ''main'' vs. ''side'' streets, whereas in California (Gunier et al, 2003;Gauderman et al, 2005) and in the Veterans Cohort Study (Lipfert et al, 2006a, b), more explicit continuous measures based on annual traffic counts within a specified land area were used.…”
Section: Traffic Exposure Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Figure 2 in Lipfert et al (2006a), this corresponds to a median traffic flow rate of about 4000 vpd, as a county average. By way of comparison, Gunier et al (2003) reported a mean annual traffic density for census block groups in California of about 19 million VKTA, with a 95th percentile value of about 113 million. One would have expected higher extreme values for census blocks than for the counties used in the Veterans Cohort Study, but this is not always the case.…”
Section: Exposure Measurements and Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%