Tradução e adaptação cultural do global appraisal of individual needs - initial

Abstract

RESUMOEste estudo objetivou traduzir e adaptar culturalmente o instrumento Global Appraisal of Individual Needs -Initial e calcular seu Índice de Validade de Conteúdo. Trata-se de estudo metodológico, de adaptação cultural do instrumento. O instrumento foi traduzido para o português em duas versões que deram origem à síntese das traduções, submetida à avaliação de quatro juízes experts na área de álcool e outras drogas. Após modificações, foi retraduzido e ressubmetido aos juízes e autores do instrumento original, resultando na versão final do instrumento, "Avaliação Global das Necessidades Individuais -Inicial" O Índice de Validade de Conteúdo do instrumento foi de 0,91, considerado válido pela literatura. O instrumento "Avaliação Global das Necessidades Individuais -Inicial" é um instrumento adaptado culturalmente para o português falado no Brasil; entretanto, não foi submetido a testes com a população-alvo, o que sugere que sejam realizados estudos que testem sua confiabilidade e validade.

Adaptação Transcultural De Instrumentos De Pesquisa Conduzida Pela Enfermagem Do Brasil: Uma Revisão Integrativa

“…Most of the articles analyzed (18) were published between the years of 2011 and 2014 [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] (Table 2) and the most frequently-found specialties were Clinical Medicine 10,13,17,25,27 and Pediatrics 9,14,17,20 . The most-used methodological framework for CCA, in 20 articles analyzed, was that with Beaton as either the main author or as a contributing author, published in different years.…”

“…The most-used methodological framework for CCA, in 20 articles analyzed, was that with Beaton as either the main author or as a contributing author, published in different years. [9][10][11][12][14][15][16][17][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] Regarding the stages of the CCA process, in 14 of the articles analyzed [11][12][14][15][16][18][19][20][21]24,[26][27][29][30] the following sequence was adopted: translation, synthesis of the translations, back-translation, analysis by a committee of specialists, and pretesting of the adapted version. 1 In the other studies [9][10]13,17,[22][23]25,28 this sequence of the process was altered.…”

“…16,21,26 In four of the articles, however, there was no information on the nationality of the translators 11,17,20,28 responsible for the stages of translation and/or back-translation of the instrument. In six 21,23,25,27,[29][30] articles analyzed, there was either a partial or total absence of information on the obligatory characteristics or criteria for selecting the translators responsible for the stages of initial translation and back-translation, or the recommendations regarding these criteria were not followed.…”

“…Regarding the number of versions produced in the translation and/or back-translation stage, in three studies 11,13,17 only one version was produced, failing to comply with the recommendations of the methodological frameworks adopted. In relation to the minimum number of participants in the sample of the pretest of the instrument, in three articles analyzed 10,[28][29] it was possible to observe the use of samples with fewer than 30 to 40 people.…”

“…Regarding the description of the procedures adopted in the stages of CCA it was observed that in 20 articles [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][19][20][21][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] the authors were concerned with giving a detailed description of the largest part of the process, evidencing the attention given to the methodological rigor adopted. 3 The description of the process of selecting the experts who made up the specialist committees was observed in 18 articles.…”