Traditional Medicare Versus Private Insurance: How Spending, Volume, And Price Change At Age Sixty-Five

Abstract

To slow the growth of Medicare spending, some policy makers have advocated raising the Medicare eligibility age from the current sixty-five years to sixty-seven years. For the majority of affected adults, this would delay entry into Medicare and increase the time they are covered by private insurance. Despite its policy importance, little is known about how such a change would affect national health care spending, which is the sum of health care spending for all consumers and payers—including governments. We examined how spending differed between Medicare and private insurance using longitudinal data on imaging and procedures for a national cohort of individuals who switched from private insurance to Medicare at age sixty-five. Using a regression discontinuity design, we found that spending fell by $38.56 per beneficiary per quarter—or 32.4 percent—upon entry into Medicare at age sixty-five. In contrast, we found no changes in the volume of services at age sixty-five. For the previously insured, entry into Medicare led to a large drop in spending driven by lower provider prices, which may reflect Medicare's purchasing power as a large insurer. These findings imply that increasing the Medicare eligibility age may raise national health care spending by replacing Medicare coverage with private insurance, which pays higher provider prices than Medicare does.

United States Health Care Reform

“…Public programs like Medicare often deliver care more cost-effectivelybycurtailingadministrativeoverheadandsecuringbetter prices from providers. 59,60 The public plan did not make it into the final legislation. Now, based on experience with the ACA, I think Congress should revisit a public plan to compete alongside private insurers in areas of the country where competition is limited.…”

Cost‐Effectiveness of Depression Screening for Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Residents

“…Costs were estimated at 200% of Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) reimbursement rates 19 . This value was selected in accordance with similar cost‐effectiveness analyses given that private insurance reimburses at rates between 100% and 300% as compared to Medicare and Medicaid 19–21 . Given the simplicity and wide accessibility of the PHQ‐9 survey instrument, the cost of screening was assumed to be negligible.…”

Red-State Medicaid Expansions — Achilles’ Heel of ACA Repeal?

“…Because Yamamoto (2013) reports relative spending by age within commercial and traditional Medicare coverage, additional information is required to put the commercial and traditional Medicare spending curves on the same absolute scale. To do so, CEA relied upon an estimate from Wallace and Song (2016) that spending falls by 34 percent, on average, for individuals converting from commercial coverage to traditional Medicare at age 65. The commercial age curve was used for all individuals with private coverage, while the traditional Medicare age curve was used for all Medicare enrollees.…”