Traditional cattle manure application determines abundance, diversity and activity of methanogenic <i>Archaea</i> in arable European soil

Gattinger, Andreas; Höfle, Manfred G.; Schloter, Michael; Embacher, A.; Böhme, Frank; Munch, Jean Charles; Labrenz, Matthias

doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01181.x

Cited by 68 publications

(48 citation statements)

References 44 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The effect of fertilizer type was smaller than soil type, although archaeal populations were significantly higher in organic fertilizer-added soil than soils with added chemical fertilizers. The effect of organic fertilizer detected in our field corresponded with previous reports using archaeal phospholipid etherlipid (PLEL) concentrations (8) and 16S rRNA gene copy numbers (42) as indicators of archaeal biomass.…”

Section: Population Of Field Soil Archaeasupporting

confidence: 72%

“…In Andosol, organic fertilizer decreased archaeal diversity, diminishing many minor bands and increasing the intensity of some bands. Other reports have also shown that long-term application of fertilizers affected archaeal communities (8,24). Nicol et al (25) reported that grassland management resulted in a reproducible shift in archaeal DGGE profiles and Gettinger et al (8) showed that molecular archaeal diversity was lower in highest fertilized treatments by cattle manure than in normal mineral fertilized treatments.…”

Section: Diversity Of Field Soil Archaeamentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In contrast, fungal communities are most closely associated with fertilizer treatment (38), i.e., changes in the soil nutrient status (18). There are a few reports on archaeal communities in agricultural soil ecosystems (8,23,29,36), but to date little is known about the effect of soil type and agricultural management practices on archaeal populations and community structure. In a long-term experimental field contained four different soil types, maintained under three different fertilizer management systems in Tsukuba, Japan, Suzuki et al (38) analyzed the effect of soil type and agricultural management practices, i.e., fertilizer type, on bacterial and fungal communities, but not on the archaeal community.…”

mentioning

confidence: 98%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Effect of Soil Type and Fertilizer Management on Archaeal Community in Upland Field Soils

et al. 2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The effects of soil and fertilizer types on archaeal communities were evaluated by real-time PCR and PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) targeting the 16S rRNA gene of total DNA directly extracted from upland field soils. Twelve experimental upland field plots containing four different soil types, i.e., Cumulic Andosol, Low-humic Andosol, Yellow Soil and Gray Lowland Soil, were maintained under three different fertilizer management systems for 8 years (chemical fertilizer, rice husks and cow manure, and pig manure, respectively). Two-way ANOVA and RDA analyses showed that the copy number and PCR-DGGE profile of archaeal 16S rRNA gene were affected mainly by soil type, especially between Andosol and non-Andosol, but were also influenced by fertilizer type. Among several soil chemical properties, total N content showed a significant correlation to archaeal community. Sequence analyses showed that most of the major DGGE bands corresponded to uncultured Crenarchaeota of Group I.1b that contained ammonia-oxidizing archaea (AOA). These sequences were separated into two clusters in the phylogenetic tree and each lineage showed a different response to total N content.

show abstract

Section: Population Of Field Soil Archaeasupporting

confidence: 72%

Section: Diversity Of Field Soil Archaeamentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 98%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Effect of Soil Type and Fertilizer Management on Archaeal Community in Upland Field Soils

et al. 2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Previous surveys of soil archaea have typically examined a limited number of samples or sites, often focusing on only a single category of soils, such as agricultural soils (Buckley et al, 1998;Furlong et al, 2002;Gattinger et al, 2007) or soils from extreme environments including deserts and recently deglaciated sites Pointing et al, 2009;Soule et al, 2009). The most comprehensive survey of archaeal populations to date (Auguet et al, 2009) provided valuable insight into broad-scale ecological patterns exhibited by the archaeal domain in general.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Examining the global distribution of dominant archaeal populations in soil

et al. 2010

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Archaea, primarily Crenarchaeota, are common in soil; however, the structure of soil archaeal communities and the factors regulating their diversity and abundance remain poorly understood. Here, we used barcoded pyrosequencing to comprehensively survey archaeal and bacterial communities in 146 soils, representing a multitude of soil and ecosystem types from across the globe. Relative archaeal abundance, the percentage of all 16S rRNA gene sequences recovered that were archaeal, averaged 2% across all soils and ranged from 0% to 410% in individual soils. Soil C:N ratio was the only factor consistently correlated with archaeal relative abundances, being higher in soils with lower C:N ratios. Soil archaea communities were dominated by just two phylotypes from a constrained clade within the Crenarchaeota, which together accounted for 470% of all archaeal sequences obtained in the survey. As one of these phylotypes was closely related to a previously identified putative ammonia oxidizer, we sampled from two long-term nitrogen (N) addition experiments to determine if this taxon responds to experimental manipulations of N availability. Contrary to expectations, the abundance of this dominant taxon, as well as archaea overall, tended to decline with increasing N. This trend was coupled with a concurrent increase in known N-oxidizing bacteria, suggesting competitive interactions between these groups.

show abstract

“…First, we considered the number of animals (poultry, pigs and cattle) living on the catchment area and the expected amount of waste material produced by these animals (Biomasse Normandie, 2002). Secondly, a literature survey on concentrations of water extractable organic carbon (WEOC) of various animal wastes, including cattle manure (CM), pig manure (PM) and poultry litter (PL), was conducted (Bernal et al, 1998;Huang et al, 2004;Zmora-Nahum et al, 2005;Angers et al, 2006;Aira et al, 2007;Gattinger et al, 2007;Guo et al, 2009; Table 3). Some discrepancies were found between studies, however, an average WEOC concentration of 12 mg g À1 for all manure types was retained as it is in accordance with most of the reports.…”

Section: Sampling Datementioning

confidence: 99%

Annual cycle of humic substances in a temperate estuarine system affected by agricultural practices

Waeles

Riso

Pernet-Coudrier

et al. 2013

Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

, et al.. Annual cycle of humic substances in a temperate estuarine system affected by agricultural practices. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, Elsevier, 2013Elsevier, , 106, pp.231-246. 10.1016Elsevier, /j.gca.2012 Annual cycle of humic substances in a temperate estuarine system affected by agricultural practices AbstractAlthough widely studied for their chemical structures and properties (e.g., metal complexation, growth stimulation of planktonic species), humic substances (HS) have been very poorly quantified in fluvial and estuarine waters. In this monthly basis study, we determined HS concentrations (by Adsorptive Square Wave Cathodic Stripping Voltammetry) along the entire river-seawater gradient of the Penzé estuary (NW France), with the aim to characterize the export of these compounds. In this watershed where agricultural activities are predominant, manuring activities were identified as being the main source of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and HS. HS concentrations varied usually within a narrow range in fluvial waters, i.e., 1.8 ± 0.4 mgC L À1 (150 ± 40 lM), but increased significantly as the first flood of autumn occurred (>4 mgC L À1 in river and upper estuary). At this time, HS accounted for a very high proportion of DOC (>80%). As evidenced by the increasing contribution of HS to DOC, and by the increasing contribution of small colloidal HS species; this autumnal flood increase should be attributed to a greater retention and transformation of organic matter on soils over the hotter, drier, and lighter period preceding the first autumnal flood. In the mixing zone, HS displayed mostly conservative behaviour, although some removals were occasionally observed. Overall, our study suggests that preservation of HS could be relatively important during their transfer across macrotidal temperate estuaries, at least in systems affected by agricultural practices.

show abstract

Traditional cattle manure application determines abundance, diversity and activity of methanogenic Archaea in arable European soil

Abstract: CitationTraditional cattle manure application determines abundance, diversity and activity of methanogenic Archaea in arable European soil.

Cited by 68 publications

References 44 publications

Effect of Soil Type and Fertilizer Management on Archaeal Community in Upland Field Soils

Effect of Soil Type and Fertilizer Management on Archaeal Community in Upland Field Soils

Examining the global distribution of dominant archaeal populations in soil

Annual cycle of humic substances in a temperate estuarine system affected by agricultural practices

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About