Proceedings of the 40th ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGAI Symposium on Principles of Database Systems 2021
DOI: 10.1145/3452021.3458331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tractable Orders for Direct Access to Ranked Answers of Conjunctive Queries

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further investigation of the speciic orders that can be eiciently achieved goes beyond the scope of this work, and indeed it was carried out following the publication of the conference version of this article. Carmeli et al [14] characterized the orders that can be achieved with logarithmic access time after linear preprocessing. They explained that the order we achieve here is lexicographical, and built upon our random-access algorithm for CQs to design an improved algorithm that supports any tractable lexicographic order speciied by the user.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Further investigation of the speciic orders that can be eiciently achieved goes beyond the scope of this work, and indeed it was carried out following the publication of the conference version of this article. Carmeli et al [14] characterized the orders that can be achieved with logarithmic access time after linear preprocessing. They explained that the order we achieve here is lexicographical, and built upon our random-access algorithm for CQs to design an improved algorithm that supports any tractable lexicographic order speciied by the user.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In turn, this implies that there is an ordering < of the UCQ's free variables ì that does not have a disruptive trio (cf. [14]) with respect to any CQ . Using results of (Section 3 of) [14], we then obtain RAccess⟨lin, log⟩-algorithms A for for all ∅ ≠ ⊆ [1, ] that also provide inverted access in logarithmic time and that, moreover, are compatible in the sense that they enumerate the query's result tuples in the same lexicographic order, namely the lexicographic order induced by the ordering < of the UCQ's free variables ì .…”
Section: Ucqs That Allow For Random-accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hardness hypotheses. Works in the wider area of enumeration [14,37,38,30] have used certain hypotheses on the hardness of algorithmic problems to prove lower bounds and achieve dichotomies for CQs. In this work, we extend some of these results to the case of ranked enumeration using the same set of hypotheses.…”
Section: Complexity Measures and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our efficient encoding of the CQ answers as a (T-)DP instance with intermediate nodes in-between bicliques [59] can be interpreted as factorization [120], which has been studied systematically in the context of factorized databases [16,105,106]. The main idea is to represent the query answers compactly while supporting different types of tasks, such as enumeration [107,83], aggregation [2,3], learning models [113], uniform sampling [39] and directly accessing ranked answers [38]. Related to this line of work are different representation schemes [84] and the exploration of the continuum between representation size and enumeration delay [49].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%