1999
DOI: 10.1055/s-1999-13674
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tracheobronchial Stenting in Patients with Esophageal Cancer Involving the Central Airways

Abstract: Complications are easily detected by the appearance of respiratory symptoms and do not necessitate systematic flexible bronchoscopy, but only preventive measures such as regular aerosol therapy, adapted respiratory physiotherapy and regular clinical follow-up.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 80% of cases, after placement of the stent there is complete closure of the fistula, nevertheless complications are familiar [2] ; which comprise of unrelenting chest pain, tracheal or esophageal mucosa necrosis due to pressure, development of granulation tissue causing stenosis, dyspnoea due to compression of the trachea, perforation, hemorrhage (which may be apparent as hemoptysis or hematemesis) and stent migration. Incidence of stent migration is 5% to 15% and urgent necessity for stent replacement [3,9,10] ; with these logistics, tumor in-growth through the stent metal in majority of patients with malignant esophageal fistulas covered stents are used as the cover prevent mesh [11] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In 80% of cases, after placement of the stent there is complete closure of the fistula, nevertheless complications are familiar [2] ; which comprise of unrelenting chest pain, tracheal or esophageal mucosa necrosis due to pressure, development of granulation tissue causing stenosis, dyspnoea due to compression of the trachea, perforation, hemorrhage (which may be apparent as hemoptysis or hematemesis) and stent migration. Incidence of stent migration is 5% to 15% and urgent necessity for stent replacement [3,9,10] ; with these logistics, tumor in-growth through the stent metal in majority of patients with malignant esophageal fistulas covered stents are used as the cover prevent mesh [11] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This complication is called a malignant esophageal fistula [1] . The occurrence of such fistulas is 10%-15% and life span is less than 7 weeks in patients who do not undergo treatment [2][3][4] . In patients with esophageal cancer, incidence of malignant esophageal-pleural fistula (EPF) is 5%-15% [5,6] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the same manner, such stenting has also been shown to be useful in the treatment of ERF (2). Although considerable evidence has demonstrated the effectiveness of airway stenting in patients with unresectable esophageal cancer over the past decade (1) F i g u r e 2 . E s o p h a g e a l c a n c e r i n v a s i o n wa s s e e n i n t h e t r a c h e a l l u me n ( a r r o w) a n d t h e c i r c u mf e r e n c e o f t h e t r a c h e a ( * ) .…”
Section: Patients Facing Imminent Suffocation Due To Central Airway Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 (Fig. 1c) (1,2,(7)(8)(9). ERF is one of the most difficult problems for the management of advanced esophageal cancer.…”
Section: Patients Facing Imminent Suffocation Due To Central Airway Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oesophageal stenting with the intention of sealing fistulas between alimentary and respiratory tract, when feasible, is often insufficient and noneffective [1,2]. Instead, tracheal or double (tracheal-oesophageal) stenting has been suggested as a valuable option [1][2][3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%