2018
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1651504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toxicity of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery May Be Greater in Patients with Lower Cranial Nerve Schwannomas

Abstract: Objective Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery (GK-SRS) is a preferred treatment option for tumors of the jugular foramen. We hypothesized that GK-SRS toxicity is higher for lower cranial nerve schwannomas than for glomus jugulare tumors despite anatomically similar locations. Methods We performed a retrospective review of all patients who received GK-SRS for glomus jugulare tumors and lower cranial nerve schwannomas at our institution between 2006 and 2014. Because of small sample sizes, Fisher's… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1,6,8-41 In addition, 13 studies were included in the systematic review for the SRS cohort series (Table 6). 42-54 In the surgical cohort, females comprised 55% of the primary surgical cohort. Nearly half of the tumors had extracranial extension (46%) although the incidence was highly variable between studies (range 0%-100%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,6,8-41 In addition, 13 studies were included in the systematic review for the SRS cohort series (Table 6). 42-54 In the surgical cohort, females comprised 55% of the primary surgical cohort. Nearly half of the tumors had extracranial extension (46%) although the incidence was highly variable between studies (range 0%-100%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surgery is not the sole option for treating these lesions. Gamma-knife stereotactic radiosurgery has been employed in the treatment of meningiomas [27] and lower cranial nerve tumors [28]. Results on hearing preservation have been published [27] and a mention of hearing improvement has been reported in that series without any audiological data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%