1995
DOI: 10.1001/archderm.131.10.1212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toxic epidermal necrolysis in Singapore, 1989 through 1993: incidence and antecedent drug exposure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Europe, TEN and SJS joint incidence is 2 cases per million inhabitants per year [13]. In Asia, it is estimated at 1.4 cases per million inhabitants per year [14]. TEN incidences in our study was 5 cases/year similar to the ones reported in several other series in sub-Saharan Africa [2,5].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In Europe, TEN and SJS joint incidence is 2 cases per million inhabitants per year [13]. In Asia, it is estimated at 1.4 cases per million inhabitants per year [14]. TEN incidences in our study was 5 cases/year similar to the ones reported in several other series in sub-Saharan Africa [2,5].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…La Grenade et al report similar results, with 1.9 cases of TEN per million inhabitants per year based on all cases reported to the FDA AERS database in the USA [6]. Lower incidence rates were reported by Chan et al in Singapore [7]. Certain infectious diseases may have an impact on the incidence of TEN, and this is clearly the case for HIV where the annual incidence is approximately 1000-fold higher than in the general population, with approximately 1 case per thousand per year in the HIV-positive population ([8].…”
Section: Epidemiologymentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Although carbamazepine is the leading cause of SJS/TEN in our series, there is only one ARF case in this group. Carbamazepine and allopurinol are the major causes of SJS/TEN in Asian patients, accounting for 25–33 and 25–37% cases, respectively, which might be related to specific HLA typing in the Chinese population [16,17,18]. Despite their similarity in frequency and genetic predisposition, they show differences in ARF susceptibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%