2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-01887-0_33
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards Design Guidelines for Physical Interfaces on Industrial Exoskeletons: Overview on Evaluation Metrics

Abstract: Physical interfaces with the body are one of the key enabling component to promote user acceptance, comfort and force transmission efficiency. A structured design workflow is needed for any application-driven product, such as industrial exoskeleton. In this paper, we review objective and subjective evaluation metrics that can be applied to physical interfaces. These indexes are analyzed to create an ordered list of requirements to guide future body attachment design. Pressure magnitude, duration, distribution,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, load cells cannot be used when the interaction between the user’s limb and the robot link is not mediated by a finite number of attachments, but by a distributed area. Pressure distribution can be useful, being directly related with the safety and comfort felt by the user during the robot operation [ 6 , 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, load cells cannot be used when the interaction between the user’s limb and the robot link is not mediated by a finite number of attachments, but by a distributed area. Pressure distribution can be useful, being directly related with the safety and comfort felt by the user during the robot operation [ 6 , 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a number of implementation barriers remain. In addition to ongoing developments in the fields of actuation and mechanical design (Calabrò et al, 2016;Sposito et al, 2019), there are still limited solutions available for recognizing the user's intent for movement and using it as a control input (Herr, 2009;Calabrò et al, 2016). Moreover, rehabilitation robots are not able to perfectly mimic the movements of the human body.…”
Section: Implementation Barriersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the prototype is expandable to additional flexible capsules with multiple pressure sensors. This may be useful, as apart from magnitude and duration, the pressure distribution is of special interest for human interfaces, which is caused by changes in human soft tissue or mismatches of exoskeletal and human axes [11], [14], [16]. In addition, the force magnitude may be solely assessable via power curves of the exoskeleton actuation or simulated human models.…”
Section: Interface Prototype With Embedded Pressure Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%