Towards an Integrated Assessment of the Cultural Ecosystem Services in the Policy-Making for Urban Ecosystems: Lessons from the Spatial and Economic Planning for Landscape and Cultural Heritage in Tuscany and Apulia (IT)

Analysing the Synergies and Trade-Offs between Ecosystem Services to Reorient Land Use Planning in Metropolitan Bilbao (Northern Spain)

“…Most analyses of ES trade-offs have focused on intact natural vegetation or protected areas [20][21][22][23]. However, in the last years more attention has been paid to the assessment of ES in more complex social-ecological systems such as metropolitan and urban areas [24][25][26][27][28], as the need to protect ES within human-dominated landscapes has been recognized by practitioners [29][30][31]. Urban populations typically obtain most of their ecosystem resources from sources that are distributed over a substantially larger area [32].…”

Re-Investigating the Roles of Green Service-scape to Improve Tourism Performance Marketing Service Dominant Logic Perspective: A Literature Review

“…Platform GSD configured the integration of environment and human resources (Pang et al, 2019), packing the demand for local products and services, increasing the training activities so that they participate in integrating the value of services towards long-term economic stability (Giray et al, 2019),, (C. Wang et al, 2018).. As in SDL's perspective that in creating a green service-scape tourist destination rely heavily on service value co-creation activities, that the value of an innovation "is not only what is produced by the producer as output but how the producer or company can serve better" (Vargo, 2018). Service value creation is more transactional and cooperation (Ballantyne & Varey, 2018), (Tutuba et al, 2019).. GSD focuses on impact-oriented services (Colavitti, USAI, & Serra, 2018).…”

Coming to grips with diverse voices in participatory heritage initiatives

“…Magnaghi's territorialist approach to heritage is well acclaimed among Italian scholars who seek to innovate heritage theories and practices while seeking wisdom from Italian cultural traditions (Rotondo 2020;Selicato 2016). This approach has inspired the reforms of heritage management in many places in Italy (though often not fully implemented), at both regional and local levels (Colavitti et al 2018;Rizzo 2016). According to this approach, heritage, or territorial heritage, is defined as: […] the outcome of the historic process of territorialization, a longer-term "deposit" whose identity and character emerge in the way the environmental components in the process (neo-ecosystems produced by successive civilizations) are integrated with the built elements (monuments, historical cities, "permanent long-term invariable structural features or infrastructures, farm layouts, building, urban and landscape types, and rules for building and transformation) with the anthropic components (social, identity-giving, cultural, artistic, productive and political models).…”

“…Partly out of the rising public appeal, partly out of the institutions' wish to justify their legitimacy, favourable changes can be seen in various spheres: numerous municipalities have increasingly begun to enact citizen participatory regulations (Colavitti et al 2018;Larcher et al 2013;Monno and Khakee 2012); the participatory framework proposed by the Territorial School scholars (Magnaghi 2005; see the proposal of the Charter of New Municipium in Magnaghi et al 2002) is increasingly advocated by regional landscape planners and heritage practitioners (Colavitti et al 2018;Rotondo 2020); ecomuseological ideas and practices have become institutionalised in various regions (Baratti 2012;Broccolini and Padiglione 2011;Rossi 2011).…”