2011
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards an Evolutionary Model of Transcription Networks

Abstract: DNA evolution models made invaluable contributions to comparative genomics, although it seemed formidable to include non-genomic features into these models. In order to build an evolutionary model of transcription networks (TNs), we had to forfeit the substitution model used in DNA evolution and to start from modeling the evolution of the regulatory relationships. We present a quantitative evolutionary model of TNs, subjecting the phylogenetic distance and the evolutionary changes of cis-regulatory sequence, g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A large phylogeny is important to be able to systematically observe patterns of conservation and divergence and to study different factors such as gene duplication that can contribute to regulatory network divergence. Existing approaches to infer regulatory networks for multiple species have either not attempted to explicitly model the phylogeny of the species involved (Penfold et al, 2015; Joshi et al, 2014), or their applications have been restricted to two or three species (Xie et al, 2011; Penfold et al, 2015). Extending such approaches to infer genome-scale networks for a large phylogeny with complex orthologies can be computationally expensive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large phylogeny is important to be able to systematically observe patterns of conservation and divergence and to study different factors such as gene duplication that can contribute to regulatory network divergence. Existing approaches to infer regulatory networks for multiple species have either not attempted to explicitly model the phylogeny of the species involved (Penfold et al, 2015; Joshi et al, 2014), or their applications have been restricted to two or three species (Xie et al, 2011; Penfold et al, 2015). Extending such approaches to infer genome-scale networks for a large phylogeny with complex orthologies can be computationally expensive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such relationships are naturally represented by a tree, and computational approaches that can incorporate the tree structure while identifying regulatory modules and networks have been useful in understanding evolutionary (Xie et al 2011;Roy et al 2013;Shay et al 2013) and developmental processes . CMINT is based on a previous module inference algorithm that we developed for species lineages (Roy et al 2013) with two major extensions.…”
Section: Cmint: Chromatin Module Inference On Treesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach works in yeasts (see e.g., [91] for a recent review or [92] for a recent analysis in fission yeasts) and starts to be applied in mammals. One example is the modeling of sequence differences, expression, and transcription factor binding in preimplantation development using human, mouse, and cow stem cells that allowed the identification of conserved and species-specific regulatory networks in these species [93]. Extending this approach to primates and to a variety of phenotypes, especially those of medical relevance, should be a worthwhile endeavor:…”
Section: Identifying Positively Selected Regions In the Human Genomementioning
confidence: 99%